Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 110 Daehang-ro, Jongno-gu, 110-744 Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;108(4):655-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer500. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
Three-phase bone scintigraphy (TPBS) is an established objective diagnostic method for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), but its validity remains controversial. The aims of this study were: (i) to re-evaluate the diagnostic performance of TPBS, and (ii) to suggest new TPBS criteria based on the proposed research criteria for CPRS in Budapest (the 2003 Budapest research criteria).
The medical records of 228 consecutive patients, evaluated using the Budapest research criteria, were retrospectively analysed. Of these, 116 patients were included in the present study, and 69 of 116 were diagnosed to have CRPS based on these criteria. The diagnostic performance of TPBS was assessed by determining its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios, and new criteria for TPBS were identified by pattern analysis using the Budapest research criteria.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of TPBS for the diagnosis of CRPS according to the Budapest research criteria were 40.0, 76.5, 1.73, and 0.78, respectively. Furthermore, D-D-D, D-D-S, and D-D-I patterns [i.e. according to decreased (D), symmetrical (S), or increased (I) tracer uptake during Phases I, II, and III] of TPBS were found to be positively predictive for CRPS.
The diagnostic value of a positive TPBS for CRPS is low from the view point of the Budapest research criteria. Our findings suggest that a diagnosis of CRPS using the Budapest research criteria should be considered when decreased patterns of TPBS are observed during Phases I and II.
三相骨闪烁扫描(TPBS)是一种用于复杂区域性疼痛综合征(CRPS)的既定客观诊断方法,但其实用性仍存在争议。本研究的目的是:(i)重新评估 TPBS 的诊断性能,以及(ii)基于布达佩斯提出的 CRPS 研究标准(2003 年布达佩斯研究标准)提出新的 TPBS 标准。
回顾性分析了 228 例连续评估的患者的病历,其中 116 例患者符合本研究标准,根据这些标准,69 例患者被诊断为 CRPS。通过确定 TPBS 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比,评估 TPBS 的诊断性能,并使用布达佩斯研究标准进行模式分析确定新的 TPBS 标准。
根据布达佩斯研究标准,TPBS 诊断 CRPS 的灵敏度、特异性、阳性似然比和阴性似然比分别为 40.0、76.5、1.73 和 0.78。此外,TPBS 的 D-D-D、D-D-S 和 D-D-I 模式(即 I 期、II 期和 III 期摄取减少[D]、对称[S]或增加[I])被发现对 CRPS 具有阳性预测价值。
从布达佩斯研究标准的角度来看,TPBS 阳性对 CRPS 的诊断价值较低。我们的研究结果表明,当在 I 期和 II 期观察到 TPBS 的减少模式时,应考虑使用布达佩斯研究标准诊断 CRPS。