Springer A D, Morel K D, Wilson B R
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, New York Medical College, Valhalla 10595.
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Aug 22;298(4):458-71. doi: 10.1002/cne.902980407.
Experiments were designed to find the degree to which regenerated optic axons occupied their previous locations in the optic tracts. Following optic nerve crush and regeneration, either the dorsal, ventral, peripheral, temporal, or nasal part of the retina was ablated. The axons of the remaining retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) were labeled with cobalt. Density of the regenerated dorsal and ventral axons in the dorsal vs. ventral optic tracts was determined digitally. In addition, we determined the density of temporal and nasal axons in the temporal vs. nasal compartments of each optic tract and the density of central axons in the central vs. peripheral compartments of both optic tracts. Regenerated axons were not distributed randomly in the optic tracts. Instead, they were slightly but, significantly biased toward growing through the tract or compartment that they had occupied previously. Still, the pathway specificity exhibited by the regenerated axons was closer to random than it was to the pathway specificity seen in normal animals. Dorsal, ventral, and central RGC axons were significantly better localized to their correct tract or compartment than were temporal or nasal RGC axons. Also, over time, dorsal and ventral axons tended to disappear from incorrectly chosen optic tracts. The slight bias toward choosing the appropriate optic tract or optic tract compartment may be enough to account for the topographic specificity of the regenerated retinotectal projection. Near-randomness of the axonal positions in the tracts argues against the presence of any specific guidance cues in the optic tracts of adult animals. Axonal density was highest in the correct compartment and diminished progressively with increasing distance into the incorrect compartment. Such a gradient of axonal density suggests that regenerating axons "drift" away from their previous positions in the optic pathways.
实验旨在确定再生的视神经轴突在视束中占据其先前位置的程度。在视神经挤压和再生后,切除视网膜的背侧、腹侧、周边、颞侧或鼻侧部分。剩余视网膜神经节细胞(RGC)的轴突用钴标记。通过数字方式确定背侧和腹侧视束中再生的背侧和腹侧轴突的密度。此外,我们还确定了每条视束的颞侧与鼻侧部分中颞侧和鼻侧轴突的密度,以及双侧视束的中央与周边部分中中央轴突的密度。再生轴突在视束中并非随机分布。相反,它们略微但显著倾向于通过其先前占据的视束或部分生长。尽管如此,再生轴突表现出的通路特异性比正常动物中所见的通路特异性更接近随机情况。背侧、腹侧和中央RGC轴突比颞侧或鼻侧RGC轴突更能显著地定位到其正确的视束或部分。而且,随着时间的推移,背侧和腹侧轴突往往会从错误选择的视束中消失。对选择合适视束或视束部分的轻微偏向可能足以解释再生的视网膜顶盖投射的拓扑特异性。视束中轴突位置的近乎随机性表明成年动物的视束中不存在任何特定的引导线索。轴突密度在正确部分最高,并随着进入错误部分距离的增加而逐渐降低。这种轴突密度梯度表明再生轴突在视通路中从其先前位置“漂移”开来。