Chattopadhyay Saayan
University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.
South Asia Res. 2011;31(3):265-79. doi: 10.1177/026272801103100305.
This article examines how Bengali masculinity has been negotiated between national and ethnic/local notions of identity and suggests a new way of understanding this issue. Within the specific historiography of Bengali masculinity, concerns regarding physical strength, courage and virility of the Bengali male have been central tropes, challenged by the colonially constructed stereotype of the effeminate Bengali. The present article maps mainly nineteenth century discourses regarding Bengali masculinity and focuses on one particular strategy of three, namely, construction of a mode of mythic-historical discourse to reclaim a supposedly more masculine past for Bengali men. This suggests the notion of national-masculine as a gendered materialisation of the compensatory agency of Bengali masculinity. Shown to occur through the articulation of buddhibal in contrast with bahubal that negotiates with the hegemonic national-masculine, this throws new light on the emerging prominence of the bhadralok concept of a sophisticated Bengali gentleman.
本文探讨了孟加拉男性气质如何在国家认同与族裔/地方认同观念之间进行协调,并提出了一种理解这一问题的新方式。在孟加拉男性气质的特定历史编纂中,对孟加拉男性体力、勇气和男子气概的关注一直是核心主题,但却受到殖民建构的柔弱孟加拉人刻板印象的挑战。本文主要梳理了19世纪关于孟加拉男性气质的论述,并聚焦于三种策略中的一种,即构建一种神话历史话语模式,为孟加拉男性找回一个据称更具男子气概的过去。这暗示了国家男性气质这一概念是孟加拉男性气质补偿机制的性别化体现。通过与霸权国家男性气质协商的“体力”相对的“智力”的表述得以呈现,这为文雅的孟加拉绅士的“上等阶层”概念的日益突出提供了新的视角。