Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR 740 INSERM, Paris, France.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;29(3):605-13. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-111622.
Differences of cortical morphology between healthy controls (HC), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been repeatedly investigated using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). However, the results obtained using mainly VBM remain difficult to interpret as they can be explained by various mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the differences of cortical morphology between HC, MCI, and AD patients using a new post-processing method based on reconstruction and identification of cortical sulci. Thirty HC, 33 MCI, and 30 AD patients were randomly selected from the ADNI database. For each subject, cortical sulci were reconstructed and automatically identified using Brainvisa software. Depth and fold opening of nine large sulci were compared between HC, MCI, and AD patients. Fold opening of parietaloccipital fissure and intraparietal sulcus on both sides strongly differed between the 3 groups, with gradual increase from HC to MCI of about 1 mm and from MCI to AD of about 2 mm (right intraparietal: p = 0.005; left intraparietal: p = 0.004; right parietaloccipital: p = 0.003; left parietaloccipital: p = 0.0009). Results were left unchanged after adjustment for age, gender, and level of education. These variables were also strongly linked to neuropsychological scores, independent of age, gender, and level of education. In the present study, we found important regional differences of cortical morphology with gradual deterioration from HC to MCI to AD. The most important differences were found in parietaloccipital fissure and intraparietal sulcus. Further studies are needed to understand the involved underlying mechanisms.
健康对照组(HC)、遗忘型轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)之间的皮质形态差异已通过基于体素的形态计量学(VBM)进行了反复研究。然而,由于可以用各种机制来解释 VBM 获得的结果,因此这些结果仍然难以解释。本研究旨在使用一种新的基于皮质沟回重建和识别的后处理方法来评估 HC、MCI 和 AD 患者之间的皮质形态差异。从 ADNI 数据库中随机选择了 30 名 HC、33 名 MCI 和 30 名 AD 患者。对于每个受试者,使用 Brainvisa 软件重建并自动识别皮质沟回。比较了 HC、MCI 和 AD 患者之间 9 个大沟的深度和褶皱开口。双侧顶枕沟和顶内沟的褶皱开口在 3 组之间存在明显差异,从中度认知障碍到 MCI 的约 1 毫米增加,从 MCI 到 AD 的约 2 毫米增加(右侧顶内沟:p = 0.005;左侧顶内沟:p = 0.004;右侧顶枕沟:p = 0.003;左侧顶枕沟:p = 0.0009)。在调整年龄、性别和教育水平后,结果保持不变。这些变量也与神经心理学评分密切相关,与年龄、性别和教育水平无关。在本研究中,我们发现了皮质形态的重要区域差异,从中度认知障碍到 AD 逐渐恶化。最重要的差异发生在顶枕沟和顶内沟。需要进一步研究以了解涉及的潜在机制。