Suppr超能文献

门诊电生理检查的可行性与成本节约

Feasibility and cost savings of outpatient electrophysiologic testing.

作者信息

Kadish A, Calkins H, de Buitleir M, Morady F

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Nov;16(6):1415-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90385-3.

Abstract

The feasibility of outpatient electrophysiologic testing was examined by reviewing 100 consecutive outpatient tests performed in 95 patients. Seventy-one of the patients (75%) had no underlying heart disease. The electrophysiologic tests were performed to evaluate supraventricular tachycardias (n = 47), nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 20), unexplained syncope (n = 21), palpitation (n = 9) or intermittent heart block (n = 2). A mean of 2.8 +/- 0.5 6F electrode catheters were inserted through a femoral vein. An electrode catheter was inserted into a subclavian or internal jugular vein in 28 tests and a 5F cannula was inserted into a femoral artery to monitor the blood pressure in 20 tests. The results of 61 tests (61%) were abnormal. Patients were monitored for a mean of 3.8 +/- 1.2 h after the procedure and then discharged. No complications occurred. For cost analysis a subgroup of 60 of these patients was matched for age, gender, heart disease and indication for electrophysiologic testing with a group of 60 patients who underwent electrophysiologic testing as inpatients. Physicians' fees for the two groups were similar; however, the mean hospital charge was $5,845 +/- 3,763 for the inpatient group compared with only $2,120 +/- 1,244 for the outpatient group (p less than 0.001). Thus, outpatient electrophysiologic testing is feasible and safe and results in substantial cost savings in patients without life-threatening arrhythmias.

摘要

通过回顾对95例患者进行的100例连续门诊电生理检查,探讨了门诊电生理检查的可行性。71例患者(75%)无基础心脏病。进行电生理检查以评估室上性心动过速(n = 47)、非持续性室性心动过速(n = 20)、不明原因晕厥(n = 21)、心悸(n = 9)或间歇性心脏传导阻滞(n = 2)。平均通过股静脉插入2.8±0.5根6F电极导管。在28次检查中,将电极导管插入锁骨下静脉或颈内静脉,在20次检查中,将5F套管插入股动脉以监测血压。61次检查(61%)结果异常。术后对患者平均监测3.8±1.2小时,然后出院。未发生并发症。为进行成本分析,将这些患者中的60例亚组按年龄、性别、心脏病和电生理检查指征与一组60例住院接受电生理检查的患者进行匹配。两组医生的费用相似;然而,住院组的平均住院费用为5845±3763美元,而门诊组仅为2120±1244美元(p<0.001)。因此,门诊电生理检查是可行且安全的,对于没有危及生命的心律失常的患者可大幅节省费用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验