Patat A, Perault M C, Vandel B, Danjou P, Brohier S, Zieleniuk I, Rosenzweig P
Synthélabo Recherche, Clinical Research Department, Clinical Pharmacology Section, 31, Av. Paul Vaillant Couturier, B. P. 110, 92225 Bagneux Cedex.
J Psychopharmacol. 1995 Jan;9(2):91-101. doi: 10.1177/026988119500900203.
Potential interactions between the imidazopyridine anxiolytic alpidem and the full benzodiazepine agonist lorazepam were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, four-way cross-over, placebo-controlled study in 16 healthy young male volunteers. Each volunteer received alpidem, 50 mg, or a placebo twice daily for 8 days with a 1- week wash-out interval. The interaction between alpidem, at the steady state, and a single oral dose of lorazepam 2 mg or a placebo was assessed after concomitant administration on days 7 or 9 of each treatment period. Psycho motor performance and cognitive function were evaluated before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 h post-dose, using objective tests [critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), digit-symbol substitution (DSST), body sway and short-term memory (Sternberg memory scanning)] and self-ratings [line analogue rating scales: (LARS)]. Long-term memory (delayed free recall and recognition of pictures) was assessed before the dose and 2 and 4 h post-dose. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated by applying repeated measures ANOVA to a 2 x 2 factorial interaction model. Alpidem, 50 mg twice daily at the steady state, was free of any clinically relevant detrimental effects on skilled performance, information processing or memory. In contrast, a single 2 mg dose of lorazepam induced marked impairment of psychomotor performance and cognitive function (significant reductions in CFF and DSST and increases in CRT and body sway), as well as subjective sedation from 2 to 8 h post-dose, depending on the test used. In addition, lorazepam induced anterograde amnesia, characterized by a decrease in delayed free recall and recognition, and a deficit in short-term memory. Finally, alpidem 50 mg did not potentiate the detrimental effects of lorazepam 2 mg. On the contrary, alpidem significantly antagonized the lorazepam-induced CRT increase and anterograde amnesia, and produced similar trends on most of the other cognitive parameters; thus, the results obtained with the combination of alpidem and lorazepam consistently indicated less impairment than those measured after lorazepam alone. These results are consistent with the suggested partial agonsist properties of alpidem at the benzodiazepine receptor and indicate that such properties can be assessed in humans based on antagonism of the effects of a full agonist.
在一项针对16名健康年轻男性志愿者的随机、双盲、四交叉、安慰剂对照研究中,评估了咪唑并吡啶类抗焦虑药阿吡坦与苯二氮䓬类全激动剂劳拉西泮之间的潜在相互作用。每位志愿者每天两次服用50毫克阿吡坦或安慰剂,共8天,中间有1周的洗脱期。在每个治疗周期的第7天或第9天同时给药后,评估稳态下阿吡坦与单次口服2毫克劳拉西泮或安慰剂之间的相互作用。使用客观测试[临界闪烁融合阈值(CFF)、选择反应时间(CRT)、数字符号替换(DSST)、身体摆动和短期记忆(斯特恩伯格记忆扫描)]和自我评分[线性模拟评分量表:(LARS)]在给药前以及给药后2、4、6和8小时评估精神运动性能和认知功能。在给药前以及给药后2和4小时评估长期记忆(延迟自由回忆和图片识别)。通过将重复测量方差分析应用于2×2析因相互作用模型来评估药效学相互作用。稳态下每天两次服用50毫克阿吡坦,对技能表现、信息处理或记忆没有任何临床相关的有害影响。相比之下,单次服用2毫克劳拉西泮会导致精神运动性能和认知功能明显受损(CFF和DSST显著降低,CRT和身体摆动增加),以及给药后2至8小时出现主观镇静,具体取决于所使用的测试。此外,劳拉西泮会导致顺行性遗忘,表现为延迟自由回忆和识别能力下降以及短期记忆缺陷。最后,50毫克阿吡坦不会增强2毫克劳拉西泮的有害作用。相反,阿吡坦显著对抗了劳拉西泮引起的CRT增加和顺行性遗忘,并且在大多数其他认知参数上产生了类似的趋势;因此,阿吡坦和劳拉西泮联合使用的结果始终表明,其损害程度低于单独使用劳拉西泮后的测量结果。这些结果与阿吡坦在苯二氮䓬受体上具有部分激动剂特性的推测一致,并表明可以基于对全激动剂作用的拮抗作用在人体中评估此类特性。