Suppr超能文献

用于李金斯坦疝修补术的“AMID”疝与皮肤缝合器:一项初步研究。

The "AMID" hernia and skin stapler for Lichtenstein hernia repair: a pilot study.

作者信息

Castillo Cesar, Légner András

机构信息

Hospital Regional Universitario José María Cabral y Báez, Santiago de los Caballeros, Dominican Republic.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2012 Sep;19(3):258-62. doi: 10.1177/1553350611429691. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Lichtenstein hernia repair is a widely accepted and durable treatment option for groin hernias, but acute and chronic postoperative pain for inguinal hernia repair remains a significant issue. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the benefit of a novel hernia stapler on acute postoperative pain after a Lichtenstein hernia repair.

METHODS

A prospective double-arm single-center trial was conducted. Nine patients underwent a Lichtenstein hernia repair using the AMID Stapler (group 1), and another 9 patients underwent a sutured Lichtenstein hernia repair (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative pain was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS). The intraoperative pain management was either local with sedation, spinal, or general anesthesia. All patients received a local anesthesia preemptively independent of the main anesthetic method. Medication usage, pain, and any procedure related adverse event were documented on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 30.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in demographic data, type or size of hernia, or in baseline pain severity between groups. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. The VAS cumulative average (±standard deviation) pain score during the first postoperative week was 126 (±9.3) and 162 (±9.4) in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P = .38). Patients in group 1 took significantly less pain medication on days 1, 2, and 3 (P < .0001, P = .004, P = .02, respectively), and there was a trend toward a lower average analgesic demand during the entire first postoperative week: 11 (±0.54) doses in group 1 and 15.4 (±0.18) doses in group 2 (P = .07).

CONCLUSION

The Lichtenstein hernia repair using the AMID Stapler is simple and safe and resulted in lower acute postoperative pain and lower analgesic consumption as compared with the sutured Lichtenstein hernia repair. A multicenter clinical trial with a large sample size is needed to more accurately study pain reduction.

摘要

背景

李金斯坦疝修补术是一种广泛接受且持久有效的腹股沟疝治疗方法,但腹股沟疝修补术后的急慢性疼痛仍是一个重要问题。本研究的目的是证明一种新型疝吻合器在李金斯坦疝修补术后对急性疼痛的益处。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性双臂单中心试验。9例患者使用AMID吻合器进行李金斯坦疝修补术(第1组),另外9例患者进行缝合的李金斯坦疝修补术(第2组)。术前和术后疼痛采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)进行测量。术中疼痛管理采用局部麻醉联合镇静、脊髓麻醉或全身麻醉。所有患者无论主要麻醉方法如何,均预先接受局部麻醉。记录术后第1、2、3、4、5、6、7和30天的用药情况、疼痛情况以及任何与手术相关的不良事件。

结果

两组在人口统计学数据、疝的类型或大小以及基线疼痛严重程度方面无显著差异。未发生术中或术后并发症。术后第一周,第1组和第2组的VAS累积平均(±标准差)疼痛评分分别为126(±9.3)和1​​62(±9.4)(P = 0.38)。第1组患者在术后第1、2和3天服用的止痛药物明显较少(分别为P < 0.0001、P = 0.004、P = 0.02),并且在术后第一周的整个期间,平均镇痛需求有降低趋势:第1组为11(±0.54)剂,第2组为15.4(±0.18)剂(P = 0.07)。

结论

与缝合的李金斯坦疝修补术相比,使用AMID吻合器进行李金斯坦疝修补术简单安全,术后急性疼痛减轻,镇痛药物消耗减少。需要进行一项大样本量的多中心临床试验,以更准确地研究疼痛减轻情况。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验