• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拇外翻角度与年龄之间的相关性。

Correlation between hallux valgus angle and age.

作者信息

Turan I

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

J Foot Surg. 1990 Jul-Aug;29(4):327-9.

PMID:2229905
Abstract

A study was made of the relationship between the hallux valgus angle and age. Between January 1983 and June 1985, 464 hallux valgus operations were performed on 404 patients at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Huddinge Hospital. The mean age of the patients was 54 +/- 12 years (range 16 to 75). The patients were divided into six groups with regard to nature and extent of radiographic changes. Linear regression analysis was used for analysis of the correlation between age and hallux valgus angle. A significant correlation was found in group 1: hallux valgus grade 1, type I (great toe rotated, slight bunion) and group 6: hallux valgus grade 2, type III (great toe rotated, severe bunion and severe arthrosis). There was a large scatter around the lines, however, which means that age is poor predictor of the hallux valgus angle.

摘要

对拇外翻角度与年龄之间的关系进行了一项研究。1983年1月至1985年6月期间,胡丁厄医院骨科对404例患者实施了464例拇外翻手术。患者的平均年龄为54±12岁(范围16至75岁)。根据影像学改变的性质和程度,将患者分为六组。采用线性回归分析年龄与拇外翻角度之间的相关性。在第1组(拇外翻1级,I型,大脚趾旋转,轻度拇囊炎)和第6组(拇外翻2级,III型,大脚趾旋转,重度拇囊炎和重度关节炎)中发现了显著相关性。然而,各条线周围的数据点分布较为分散,这意味着年龄并不能很好地预测拇外翻角度。

相似文献

1
Correlation between hallux valgus angle and age.拇外翻角度与年龄之间的相关性。
J Foot Surg. 1990 Jul-Aug;29(4):327-9.
2
Relationship of Radiographic and Clinical Parameters With Hallux Valgus and Second Ray Pathology.影像学和临床参数与拇外翻及第二跖骨病理的关系。
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Jan;38(1):14-19. doi: 10.1177/1071100716666562. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
3
Hallux valgus and first ray mobility. A prospective study.拇外翻与第一跖骨活动度。一项前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1887-98. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01139.
4
Sensory dysfunction in the great toe in hallux valgus.拇外翻中拇趾的感觉功能障碍。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Jan;86(1):54-7.
5
Roentgenographic assessment in hallux valgus.拇外翻的X线评估
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991 Jun(267):143-7.
6
Relationship between stress fractures of the proximal phalanx of the great toe and hallux valgus.拇趾近节趾骨应力性骨折与拇外翻之间的关系。
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Jun;32(4):1032-4. doi: 10.1177/0363546503258780.
7
A Clinician-Free Method Using Top-View Photography for Screening and Monitoring Hallux Valgus.一种无需临床医生参与的使用顶视图摄影进行拇外翻筛查和监测的方法。
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2021 Sep 1;111(5). doi: 10.7547/19-167.
8
Comparison of designed slippers splints with the splints available on the market in the treatment of hallux valgus.设计的拖鞋式夹板与市场上现有夹板在治疗拇外翻方面的比较。
Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(2):107-12.
9
Articular chondral damage of the first metatarsal head and sesamoids: analysis of cadaver hallux valgus.第一跖骨头和籽骨的关节软骨损伤:尸检拇外翻分析。
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Aug;34(8):1090-6. doi: 10.1177/1071100713481461. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
10
The effects of a new foot-toe orthosis in treating painful hallux valgus.一种新型足趾矫形器治疗拇外翻疼痛的效果
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Dec;83(12):1792-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34835.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjusted Indirect and Mixed Comparisons of Conservative Treatments for Hallux Valgus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.保守治疗拇外翻的调整间接和混合比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;18(7):3841. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073841.
2
The influence of obesity and gender on outcome after reversed L-shaped osteotomy for hallux valgus.肥胖和性别对拇外翻反 L 形截骨术后结果的影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 15;20(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2823-6.
3
The influence of the number of screws and additional surgical procedures on outcome in hallux valgus treatment.
螺钉数量及额外手术操作对拇外翻治疗效果的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Apr 25;13(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0796-z.