Wolf-Rogers J, Weare J A, Rice K, Robertson E F, Guidinger P, Khalil O S, Madsen G
Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL 60064.
J Immunol Methods. 1990 Oct 19;133(2):191-8. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(90)90359-4.
A chemiluminescent, microparticle-membrane capture immunoassay (CLIA/MMC) for the detection of antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is described. The assay utilizes recombinant hepatitis B core antigen coupled to carboxylated latex microparticles. Human polyclonal IgG anti-HBc labelled with acridinium competes with antibody in the sample for a limited number of binding sites on the solid phase. After a 40 min incubation at 40 degrees C, the reaction mixture is transferred to a glass fiber capture membrane and washed. A chemiluminescent signal is produced by addition of alkaline peroxide and is quantitated on a semi-automated reader as described. The CLIA/MMC assay was compared with standard EIA and RIA procedures (Corzyme and Corab, respectively, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL). Assay sensitivities were RIA greater than CLIA/MMC greater than EIA. A population of 200 normal blood donors showed nearly identical distributions with the CLIA/MMC and RIA (mean = 11% inhibition, SD = 13% for both), compared with the EIA (mean = 13% inhibition, SD = 15%). With a selected plasma population (n = 307), the CLIA/MMC immunoassay showed an excellent correlation (r = 0.94) with both the EIA and RIA procedures. Association of anti-HBc reactivity near assay cutoffs with antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen suggested relative specificity in the order RIA greater than CLIA/MMC greater than EIA. The CLIA/MMC procedure, which can be readily automated, provides a non-istopic alternative to current EIA testing with performance more nearly equivalent to RIA.
本文描述了一种用于检测乙型肝炎核心抗原抗体(抗 - HBc)的化学发光微粒膜捕获免疫测定法(CLIA/MMC)。该测定法利用与羧化乳胶微粒偶联的重组乙型肝炎核心抗原。用吖啶鎓标记的人多克隆 IgG 抗 - HBc 与样品中的抗体竞争固相上有限数量的结合位点。在 40℃孵育 40 分钟后,将反应混合物转移至玻璃纤维捕获膜并进行洗涤。通过添加碱性过氧化物产生化学发光信号,并按所述在半自动读数器上进行定量。将 CLIA/MMC 测定法与标准酶免疫测定法(EIA)和放射免疫测定法(RIA)程序(分别为 Corzyme 和 Corab,雅培实验室,伊利诺伊州北芝加哥)进行比较。测定灵敏度为 RIA 大于 CLIA/MMC 大于 EIA。200 名正常献血者群体中,CLIA/MMC 和 RIA 的分布几乎相同(两者的平均值 = 11%抑制率,标准差 = 13%),而 EIA 的分布为(平均值 = 13%抑制率,标准差 = 15%)。对于选定的血浆群体(n = 307),CLIA/MMC 免疫测定法与 EIA 和 RIA 程序均显示出极好的相关性(r = 0.94)。在测定临界值附近抗 - HBc 反应性与乙型肝炎表面抗原抗体的关联表明相对特异性顺序为 RIA 大于 CLIA/MMC 大于 EIA。CLIA/MMC 程序易于自动化,为当前的 EIA 检测提供了一种非同位素替代方法,其性能更接近 RIA。