Imaz Arkaitz, Olmo Montserrat, Peñaranda Maria, Gutiérrez Félix, Romeu Joan, Larrousse Maria, Domingo Pere, Oteo José A, Niubó Jordi, Curto Jordi, Vilallonga Concepción, Masiá Mar, López-Aldeguer José, Iribarren José A, Podzamczer Daniel
HIV Unit, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Antivir Ther. 2012;17(3):577-83. doi: 10.3851/IMP2025. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
Structured antiretroviral therapy interruption (TI) is discouraged because of poorer AIDS and non-AIDS-related outcomes, but is often inevitable in clinical practice. Certain strategies could reduce the emergence of resistance mutations related to TI.
A total of 106 HIV-1-infected patients on stable HAART with undetectable plasma viral load were randomized to therapy continuation (n=50) or CD4(+) T-cell-guided TI (n=56). Staggered interruption involved stopping non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) 7 days before the nucleoside backbone. Genotypic resistance testing (GRT) was performed on proviral DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline and before each TI, and on plasma RNA after each TI.
At baseline, GRT on PBMCs detected mutations in nine patients and only two major mutations were identified. GRT on plasma samples performed after TIs showed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), NNRTI and protease inhibitor major resistance associated mutations in 10/56, 3/46 and 1/8 patients receiving these drugs, respectively. Only in two patients had the same mutations been observed in GRT on PBMCs at baseline. Three patients presented virological failure after resumption of therapy, all receiving NNRTIs. In one of them, resistance mutations detected at failure had been also observed previously in GRT on plasma after TI.
Staggered interruption of NNRTIs 7 days before the nucleoside backbone does not avoid resistance emergence completely, but does not necessarily lead to virological failure after treatment resumption. Plasma HIV-1 RNA genotype after the interruption and the patient's treatment history seem to be more useful than baseline proviral DNA genotype to assess the risk of virological failure after restarting therapy.
由于结构化抗逆转录病毒治疗中断(TI)会导致更差的艾滋病及非艾滋病相关结局,因此不提倡使用,但在临床实践中这往往不可避免。某些策略可能会减少与TI相关的耐药突变的出现。
共有106名接受稳定高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)且血浆病毒载量不可检测的HIV-1感染患者被随机分为继续治疗组(n = 50)或CD4(+) T细胞引导的TI组(n = 56)。交错中断包括在核苷类药物主干治疗前7天停用非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)。在基线时、每次TI前对外周血单个核细胞(PBMCs)的前病毒DNA进行基因分型耐药检测(GRT),并在每次TI后对血浆RNA进行检测。
基线时,对PBMCs进行的GRT在9名患者中检测到突变,仅鉴定出两个主要突变。TI后对血浆样本进行的GRT显示,接受这些药物治疗的患者中,分别有10/56、3/46和1/8的患者出现核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)、NNRTI和蛋白酶抑制剂主要耐药相关突变。仅在两名患者中,基线时对PBMCs进行的GRT中观察到相同的突变。三名患者在恢复治疗后出现病毒学失败,均接受NNRTIs治疗。其中一名患者在治疗失败时检测到的耐药突变此前在TI后血浆的GRT中也有观察到。
在核苷类药物主干治疗前7天交错中断NNRTIs并不能完全避免耐药的出现,但不一定会导致恢复治疗后出现病毒学失败。中断后血浆HIV-1 RNA基因型和患者的治疗史似乎比基线前病毒DNA基因型更有助于评估重新开始治疗后病毒学失败的风险。