Suppr超能文献

经表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(胎龄<30 周)行鼻间歇正压通气:一项随机对照试验。

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

USC Division of Neonatal Medicine, LAC+USC Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of early extubation to nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) on the need for mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube (MVET) at 7 days of age in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation requiring intubation and surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) within 60  min of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 57 infants were randomized within 120  min of birth to NCPAP (BW 1099 g and GA 27.8 weeks) and 53 infants to NIPPV (BW 1052  g, and GA 27.8 weeks). Infants were stabilized on NCPAP at birth and were given poractant alfa combined with MVET within 60  min of age. When stabilized on MVET, they were extubated within the next hours or days to NCPAP or NIPPV.

RESULT

A total of 42% [corrected] of infants needed MVET at 7 days of age in the NCPAP group compared with 17% in the NIPPV group (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.5, 8.7). Days on MVET were 12 ± 11 days in NCPAP group compared with 7.5 ± 12 days in the NIPPV group (median 1 vs 7 days; P=0.006). Clinical bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was 39% in the NCPAP group compared to 21% in the NIPPV group (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.02, 5.6). Physiological BPD was 46% in the NCPAP group compared with 11% in the NIPPV group (OR: 6.6, 95% CI: 2.4, 17.8; P=0.001). There were no differences in any other outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

NIPPV compared with NCPAP reduced the need for MVET in the first week, duration of MVET, and clinical as well as physiological BPD in preterm infants receiving early surfactant for RDS.

摘要

目的

比较经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)对胎龄<30 周、需要气管内插管和表面活性物质治疗呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿在出生后 60 分钟内接受治疗,并在 7 天时通过气管内插管(MVET)需要机械通气的影响。

研究设计

多中心、随机、对照试验。共有 57 名婴儿在出生后 120 分钟内随机分为 NCPAP 组(BW 1099 g,GA 27.8 周)和 53 名婴儿分为 NIPPV 组(BW 1052 g,GA 27.8 周)。NCPAP 组在出生时稳定,并在出生后 60 分钟内给予猪肺表面活性剂联合 MVET。当在 MVET 上稳定时,在接下来的几个小时或几天内将其气管内拔管至 NCPAP 或 NIPPV。

结果

NCPAP 组有 42%[校正]的婴儿在 7 天时需要 MVET,而 NIPPV 组为 17%(OR:3.6;95%CI:1.5,8.7)。NCPAP 组的 MVET 天数为 12±11 天,NIPPV 组为 7.5±12 天(中位数 1 与 7 天;P=0.006)。NCPAP 组临床支气管肺发育不良(BPD)为 39%,NIPPV 组为 21%(OR:2.4;95%CI:1.02,5.6)。NCPAP 组生理 BPD 为 46%,NIPPV 组为 11%(OR:6.6,95%CI:2.4,17.8;P=0.001)。两组在其他任何结局上均无差异。

结论

与 NCPAP 相比,NIPPV 可减少接受早期表面活性物质治疗 RDS 的早产儿在第一周内对 MVET 的需求、MVET 的持续时间以及临床和生理 BPD。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验