• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(胎龄<30 周)行鼻间歇正压通气:一项随机对照试验。

Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

USC Division of Neonatal Medicine, LAC+USC Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital and Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

DOI:10.1038/jp.2012.1
PMID:22301528
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of early extubation to nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) on the need for mechanical ventilation via endotracheal tube (MVET) at 7 days of age in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation requiring intubation and surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) within 60  min of delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 57 infants were randomized within 120  min of birth to NCPAP (BW 1099 g and GA 27.8 weeks) and 53 infants to NIPPV (BW 1052  g, and GA 27.8 weeks). Infants were stabilized on NCPAP at birth and were given poractant alfa combined with MVET within 60  min of age. When stabilized on MVET, they were extubated within the next hours or days to NCPAP or NIPPV.

RESULT

A total of 42% [corrected] of infants needed MVET at 7 days of age in the NCPAP group compared with 17% in the NIPPV group (OR: 3.6; 95% CI: 1.5, 8.7). Days on MVET were 12 ± 11 days in NCPAP group compared with 7.5 ± 12 days in the NIPPV group (median 1 vs 7 days; P=0.006). Clinical bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was 39% in the NCPAP group compared to 21% in the NIPPV group (OR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.02, 5.6). Physiological BPD was 46% in the NCPAP group compared with 11% in the NIPPV group (OR: 6.6, 95% CI: 2.4, 17.8; P=0.001). There were no differences in any other outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

NIPPV compared with NCPAP reduced the need for MVET in the first week, duration of MVET, and clinical as well as physiological BPD in preterm infants receiving early surfactant for RDS.

摘要

目的

比较经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)对胎龄<30 周、需要气管内插管和表面活性物质治疗呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿在出生后 60 分钟内接受治疗,并在 7 天时通过气管内插管(MVET)需要机械通气的影响。

研究设计

多中心、随机、对照试验。共有 57 名婴儿在出生后 120 分钟内随机分为 NCPAP 组(BW 1099 g,GA 27.8 周)和 53 名婴儿分为 NIPPV 组(BW 1052 g,GA 27.8 周)。NCPAP 组在出生时稳定,并在出生后 60 分钟内给予猪肺表面活性剂联合 MVET。当在 MVET 上稳定时,在接下来的几个小时或几天内将其气管内拔管至 NCPAP 或 NIPPV。

结果

NCPAP 组有 42%[校正]的婴儿在 7 天时需要 MVET,而 NIPPV 组为 17%(OR:3.6;95%CI:1.5,8.7)。NCPAP 组的 MVET 天数为 12±11 天,NIPPV 组为 7.5±12 天(中位数 1 与 7 天;P=0.006)。NCPAP 组临床支气管肺发育不良(BPD)为 39%,NIPPV 组为 21%(OR:2.4;95%CI:1.02,5.6)。NCPAP 组生理 BPD 为 46%,NIPPV 组为 11%(OR:6.6,95%CI:2.4,17.8;P=0.001)。两组在其他任何结局上均无差异。

结论

与 NCPAP 相比,NIPPV 可减少接受早期表面活性物质治疗 RDS 的早产儿在第一周内对 MVET 的需求、MVET 的持续时间以及临床和生理 BPD。

相似文献

1
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.经表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(胎龄<30 周)行鼻间歇正压通气:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
2
Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates.比较三种早产儿初始呼吸管理方法的随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1069-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3848. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
3
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.在早产儿微创表面活性剂治疗方法中,鼻持续气道正压通气与鼻间歇正压通气的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101(4):F323-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308204. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
4
[A randomized controlled study of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome].鼻间歇正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照研究
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;15(9):713-7.
5
A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome.一项关于无创正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻塞持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)用于早产和足月呼吸窘迫综合征婴儿的前瞻性、随机对照研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014 Jul;49(7):673-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22883. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
6
Nasal respiratory support through the nares: its time has come.经鼻腔给予呼吸支持:是时候了。
J Perinatol. 2010 Oct;30 Suppl:S67-72. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.99.
7
Comparison of Early Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.比较经鼻间歇正压通气和经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果。
J Trop Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;65(4):352-360. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmy058.
8
A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants.经鼻持续气道正压通气两种水平用于拔管后早产儿的随机对照试验
J Pediatr. 2014 Jan;164(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
9
Type and timing of ventilation in the first postnatal week is associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia/death.新生儿出生后第一周的通气类型和时机与支气管肺发育不良/死亡有关。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):321-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1268708. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
10
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome.早期经鼻间歇正压通气与持续气道正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的比较
Acta Paediatr. 2009 Sep;98(9):1412-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01348.x. Epub 2009 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Bubble NIPPV: Guidelines for Use.气泡式无创正压通气:使用指南。
Children (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;12(7):834. doi: 10.3390/children12070834.
2
Postextubation use of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis.早产儿拔管后无创呼吸支持的应用:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 11;7(7):CD014509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014509.pub2.
3
Comparative effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with RDS: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
经鼻间歇正压通气与持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的比较效果:随机对照试验的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 28;184(7):455. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06282-7.
4
The Outcomes of Preterm Infants with Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated by Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation.微创表面活性剂治疗联合无创通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的疗效
Biomedicines. 2024 Apr 10;12(4):838. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040838.
5
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)及鼻间歇正压通气作为孕龄≥32周婴儿主要呼吸支持的比较:一项三臂多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7.
6
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.经气管插管拔管后的早产儿使用经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4.
7
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.早期经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与早期经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)治疗早产儿的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3.
8
Structural and haemodynamic evaluation of less invasive surfactant administration during nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in surfactant-deficient newborn piglets.经鼻间歇正压通气中应用微创表面活性剂给药在缺乏表面活性物质的新生仔猪中的结构和血流动力学评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 28;18(4):e0284750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284750. eCollection 2023.
9
Efficacy and safety of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation and nasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经鼻间歇正压通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Transl Pediatr. 2022 Jul;11(7):1242-1250. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-288.
10
Reintubation rates after extubation to different non-invasive ventilation modes in preterm infants.早产儿拔管后不同无创通气模式下的再插管率。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02760-7.