• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)及鼻间歇正压通气作为孕龄≥32周婴儿主要呼吸支持的比较:一项三臂多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Zhou Rong, Xiong Tao, Tang Jun, Huang Yi, Liu Wenli, Zhu Jun, Chen Chao, Gong Lingyue, Tian Ke, Wang Aoyu, Mu Dezhi

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 20, Section Three, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, China.

Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University) Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7
PMID:37803402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10557210/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health problems in neonates with gestational age (GA) ≥ 32 weeks remain a major medical concern. Respiratory distress (RD) is one of the common reasons for admission of neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) represents a crucial approach to treat RD, and currently, the most used NIV modes in neonatal intensive care unit include high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Although extensive evidence supports the use of NIPPV in neonates with a GA < 32 weeks, limited data exist regarding its effectiveness in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of HFNC, CPAP, and NIPPV as primary NIV in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks who experience RD.

METHODS

This trial is designed as an assessor-blinded, three-arm, multi-center, parallel, randomized controlled trial, conducted in neonates ≥ 32 weeks' GA requiring primary NIV in the first 24 h of life. The neonates will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: HFNC, CPAP or NIPPV group. The effectiveness, safety and comfort of NIV will be evaluated. The primary outcome is the occurrence of treatment failure within 72 h after enrollment. Secondary outcomes include death before discharge, surfactant treatment within 72 h after randomization, duration of both noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation, duration of oxygen therapy, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, time to achieve full enteral nutrition, necrotizing enterocolitis, duration of admission, cost of admission, air leak syndrome, nasal trauma, and comfort score.

DISCUSSION

Currently, there is a paucity of data regarding the utilization of NIPPV in neonates with GA ≥ 32 weeks. This study will provide clinical evidence for the development of respiratory treatment strategies in neonates at GA ≥ 32 weeks with RD, with the aim of minimizing the incidence of tracheal intubation and reducing the complications associated with NIV.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2300069192. Registered on March 9, 2023, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=171491 .

摘要

背景

胎龄(GA)≥32周的新生儿健康问题仍是主要的医学关注点。呼吸窘迫(RD)是GA≥32周新生儿入院的常见原因之一。无创通气(NIV)是治疗RD的关键方法,目前新生儿重症监护病房最常用的NIV模式包括高流量鼻导管(HFNC)、持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和鼻间歇正压通气。尽管有大量证据支持在GA<32周的新生儿中使用无创正压通气(NIPPV),但关于其在GA≥32周新生儿中的有效性的数据有限。因此,本研究的目的是比较HFNC、CPAP和NIPPV作为主要NIV在GA≥32周且发生RD的新生儿中的临床疗效。

方法

本试验设计为一项评估者盲法、三臂、多中心、平行、随机对照试验,在GA≥32周且在出生后24小时内需要进行主要NIV的新生儿中进行。新生儿将被随机分配到三组之一:HFNC组、CPAP组或NIPPV组。将评估NIV的有效性、安全性和舒适性。主要结局是入组后72小时内治疗失败的发生情况。次要结局包括出院前死亡、随机分组后72小时内的表面活性剂治疗、无创和有创机械通气的持续时间、氧疗持续时间、支气管肺发育不良、实现完全肠内营养的时间、坏死性小肠结肠炎、住院时间、住院费用、气漏综合征、鼻外伤和舒适度评分。

讨论

目前,关于GA≥32周新生儿使用NIPPV的数据很少。本研究将为GA≥32周且患有RD的新生儿制定呼吸治疗策略提供临床证据,目的是尽量减少气管插管的发生率并减少与NIV相关的并发症。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2300069192。于2023年3月9日注册,https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=171491 。

相似文献

1
High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as primary respiratory support in infants of ≥ 32 weeks gestational age (GA): study protocol for a three-arm multi-center randomized controlled trial.高流量鼻导管(HFNC)与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)及鼻间歇正压通气作为孕龄≥32周婴儿主要呼吸支持的比较:一项三臂多中心随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2023 Oct 6;24(1):647. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07665-7.
2
Response of Preterm Infants to 2 Noninvasive Ventilatory Support Systems: Nasal CPAP and Nasal Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation.早产儿对两种无创通气支持系统的反应:鼻持续气道正压通气和鼻间歇正压通气。
Respir Care. 2015 Dec;60(12):1772-6. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03565. Epub 2015 Sep 15.
3
Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: Study protocol for a multi-center prospective randomized controlled trial.无创高频振荡通气与经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的比较:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jun 14;19(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2673-9.
4
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.在早产儿微创表面活性剂治疗方法中,鼻持续气道正压通气与鼻间歇正压通气的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101(4):F323-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308204. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.拔管后早产儿使用鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.
6
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.早期经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与早期经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)治疗早产儿的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3.
7
High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.用于早产儿呼吸支持的高流量鼻导管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2(2):CD006405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub3.
8
Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants.经鼻高流量治疗在早产儿原发性呼吸支持中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 5;5(5):CD006405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub4.
9
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.早期经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与早期经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)用于早产儿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub2.
10
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.经气管插管拔管后的早产儿使用经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
RAM cannula versus short binasal prongs for nasal continuous positive airway pressure delivery in preterm infants: a randomized, noninferiority trial from low-middle-income country.随机、非劣效性试验:早产儿经鼻持续气道正压通气中 RAM 管与短鼻塞对鼻塞的比较:来自中低收入国家。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Dec;181(12):4111-4119. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04620-7. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
2
A randomised trial comparing weaning from CPAP alone with weaning using heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in very preterm infants: the CHiPS study.一项比较极早产儿单纯从持续气道正压通气(CPAP)撤机与使用温热湿化高流量鼻导管撤机的随机试验:CHiPS研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 Jul 18;108(1):63-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-323636.
3
Training on the Silverman and Andersen score improved how special care unit nurses assessed neonatal respiratory distress in a low-resource setting.
在资源匮乏环境下,对特殊护理病房护士进行 Silverman 和 Andersen 评分培训,可改善其对新生儿呼吸窘迫的评估能力。
Acta Paediatr. 2022 Oct;111(10):1866-1869. doi: 10.1111/apa.16450. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
4
Use of high flow nasal cannula in Spanish neonatal units.高流量鼻导管在西班牙新生儿病房中的应用。
An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2022 Apr;96(4):319-325. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2021.02.015. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome.鼻塞持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征。
Clin Perinatol. 2021 Dec;48(4):725-744. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants.持续气道正压通气(CPAP)用于治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):CD002271. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002271.pub3.
7
Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review.新生儿疼痛、躁动与镇静评分量表的使用、信度和效度:系统评价。
J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1753-1763. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00840-7. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
The use and reporting of neonatal pain scales: a systematic review of randomized trials.新生儿疼痛量表的使用和报告:一项随机试验的系统评价。
Pain. 2021 Feb 1;162(2):353-360. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002046.
9
Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.无创性呼吸支持模式在有呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿原发性呼吸支持中的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Nov;55(11):2940-2963. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25011. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Comparison of Nasal CPAP versus Bi-level CPAP in Transient Tachypnea of the Newborn: A Randomized Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与双水平气道正压通气治疗新生儿暂时性呼吸急促的比较:一项随机试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Dec;38(14):1483-1487. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713815. Epub 2020 Jun 28.