Department of Histopathology, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth 6008, Western Australia.
Hum Pathol. 2012 Aug;43(8):1177-83. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.10.009. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
The association between ovarian endometrioid adenocarcinoma and endometriosis is well established. However, not all endometrioid adenocarcinomas are directly related to endometriosis, and it has been suggested that there may be clinicopathologic differences between endometriosis-positive and endometriosis-negative tumors. Molecular alterations in endometrioid adenocarcinoma include KRAS and BRAF mutations, but the incidence of these abnormalities in previous reports has been highly variable (0%-36% and 0%-24%, respectively). This may be explained by relatively small sample sizes in earlier studies but could also reflect difficulties in accurately classifying high-grade ovarian malignancies. In the current study, we investigated KRAS and BRAF mutations in 78 low-grade (FIGO grade 1 and 2) endometrioid adenocarcinomas and compared the results with the presence of endometriosis in the tumor-associated ovary and/or in other pelvic sites. KRAS mutations were identified in 12 (29%) of 42 endometriosis-associated endometrioid adenocarcinomas with satisfactory analysis but in only 1 (3%) of 29 tumors in which endometriosis was not identified. BRAF mutation was identified only in a single endometriosis-associated case. These findings support the hypothesis that endometriosis-associated and independent endometrioid adenocarcinoma may develop via different molecular pathways and that KRAS mutations have an important role only in the former tumors. In contrast, BRAF mutations do not appear to have a significant role in either endometrioid adenocarcinoma subgroup. This may be relevant to future targeted therapies in patients with high-stage or recurrent disease and indicate that histopathologists should carefully examine endometrioid adenocarcinoma specimens, including nonneoplastic tissues, for the presence of endometriosis.
卵巢子宫内膜样腺癌与子宫内膜异位症之间存在密切关联。然而,并非所有子宫内膜样腺癌都与子宫内膜异位症直接相关,并且有人提出,子宫内膜异位症阳性和阴性肿瘤之间可能存在临床病理差异。子宫内膜样腺癌的分子改变包括 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变,但之前的报道中这些异常的发生率差异很大(分别为 0%-36%和 0%-24%)。这可能是由于早期研究的样本量相对较小,但也可能反映出准确分类高级别卵巢恶性肿瘤存在困难。在当前研究中,我们调查了 78 例低级别(FIGO 分级 1 和 2)子宫内膜样腺癌中的 KRAS 和 BRAF 突变,并将结果与肿瘤相关卵巢和/或其他盆腔部位的子宫内膜异位症存在情况进行了比较。在可进行充分分析的 42 例与子宫内膜异位症相关的子宫内膜样腺癌中,有 12 例(29%)发现 KRAS 突变,但在 29 例未发现子宫内膜异位症的肿瘤中仅发现 1 例(3%)。仅在 1 例与子宫内膜异位症相关的病例中发现 BRAF 突变。这些发现支持以下假设,即与子宫内膜异位症相关的和独立的子宫内膜样腺癌可能通过不同的分子途径发展,并且 KRAS 突变仅在前者肿瘤中起重要作用。相比之下,BRAF 突变似乎在这两个子宫内膜样腺癌亚组中都没有显著作用。这可能与高分期或复发性疾病患者的未来靶向治疗相关,并表明组织病理学家应仔细检查子宫内膜样腺癌标本,包括非肿瘤组织,以确定是否存在子宫内膜异位症。