Suppr超能文献

选择加入或选择退出器官移植。

Opt-in or opt-out for organ transplantation.

机构信息

Paris 13 University and Avicenne University Hospital, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de Paris, France.

出版信息

Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Apr;25(2):199-203. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283504c33.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Opt-in or opt-out consent for organ transplantation is still a disputed subject and the determination of the more appropriate system is still debated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Europe is still divided between countries where transplantation after brain death is governed by presumed consent and other where informed consent is mandatory. Recent debate, however, has emerged in each country to determine whether shifting systems might be beneficial for organ procurement.

SUMMARY

Consent for organ donation in a brain dead patient represents an act of benevolence or of solidarity in favour of an unknown person. If one considers that the principle of autonomy must prevail over the principle of benevolence or of solidarity, the risk is depriving a potential recipient of a comparatively very important benefit. On the contrary, if one considers that the principles of benevolence should necessarily lead, the risk is high of exerting an excessive pressure to the detriments of autonomy and liberty of the individual. Whatever the system chosen, adequate and fair communication expressing loyally the way families are approached is essential.

摘要

目的综述

器官移植的选择加入或选择退出同意仍然是一个有争议的话题,哪种制度更为合适仍存在争议。

最近的发现

欧洲仍然分为两类国家,一类是脑死亡后的移植受推定同意管辖,另一类是知情同意是强制性的。然而,最近在每个国家都出现了关于是否可能改变制度以有利于器官获取的辩论。

摘要

脑死亡患者的器官捐赠同意代表了一种仁慈或团结的行为,有利于一个未知的人。如果有人认为自主权原则必须优先于仁慈或团结原则,那么就有可能剥夺一个潜在受赠者获得相对非常重要的利益的机会。相反,如果有人认为仁慈原则必然会导致这种情况,那么就有可能对个人的自主权和自由施加过度的压力。无论选择哪种制度,都必须进行充分和公平的沟通,忠实地表达与家属接触的方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验