• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

器官捐赠中的推定同意:这一责任最终落到我们身上了吗?

Presumed consent in organ donation: is the duty finally upon us?

作者信息

Cherkassky Lisa

机构信息

Bradford University Law School, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Law. 2010 Mar;17(2):149-64.

PMID:20443442
Abstract

In recent years there has been a renewed interest in presumed consent systems for organ donation. The U.K.'s Organ Donation (Presumed Consent and Safeguards) Bill of 2004 proposed a sweeping change in the law in the form of an opt-out system for the donation of cadaver organs. The Organ Donation Task-force in 2008 later examined the idea of presumed consent at length, before concluding that our current organ procurement system needs a radical overhaul. Most recently, the Organ Donation (Presumed Consent) Bill of 2009 ("the 2009 Bill") provided the most comprehensive proposal yet for an opt-out organ donation system in the United Kingdom. Is it now time to take this controversial issue seriously? If the 2009 Bill provides a window into the future, what practical and ethical difficulties will this new presumed consent legislation impart upon our current organ procurement system? This article will provide an overview of the previous attempts in the U.K. to implement an opt-out system for organ donation, before examining in detail the content of the 2009 Bill as a potential template for a new presumed consent law. Finally, some sweeping amendments to the 2009 Bill will be suggested, and it will be concluded that a new piece of legislation may change our national and international views of organ donation for the better.

摘要

近年来,人们对器官捐赠的推定同意系统重新产生了兴趣。英国2004年的《器官捐赠(推定同意和保障措施)法案》提议以尸体器官捐赠的退出系统形式对法律进行全面改革。2008年的器官捐赠特别工作组随后详细研究了推定同意的概念,最后得出结论,认为我们目前的器官获取系统需要彻底改革。最近,2009年的《器官捐赠(推定同意)法案》(“2009年法案”)为英国的退出式器官捐赠系统提供了迄今为止最全面的提议。现在是认真对待这个有争议的问题的时候了吗?如果2009年法案为未来提供了一个窗口,那么这项新的推定同意立法将给我们目前的器官获取系统带来哪些实际和伦理上的困难呢?本文将概述英国此前为实施器官捐赠退出系统所做的尝试,然后详细审视2009年法案的内容,将其作为新的推定同意法的潜在模板。最后,将对2009年法案提出一些全面的修正案,并得出结论,一项新的立法可能会改善我们在国内和国际上对器官捐赠的看法。

相似文献

1
Presumed consent in organ donation: is the duty finally upon us?器官捐赠中的推定同意:这一责任最终落到我们身上了吗?
Eur J Health Law. 2010 Mar;17(2):149-64.
2
[An ethical evaluation of presumed consent for organ donation in Switzerland].[瑞士器官捐赠推定同意的伦理评估]
Rev Med Suisse. 2020 Feb 19;16(682):370-373.
3
It will take more than an opt-out system to increase organ donation: prioritise donors to receive organs.要增加器官捐献,仅靠退出系统是不够的:应优先考虑捐献者以获得器官。
BMJ. 2015 Oct 20;351:h5165. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5165.
4
A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation.对已故器官捐赠的推定同意系统的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 May;13(26):iii, ix-xi, 1-95. doi: 10.3310/hta13260.
5
Do we need to change the legislation to a system of presumed consent to address organ shortage?我们是否需要将立法改为推定同意制度来解决器官短缺问题?
Med Sci Law. 2010 Apr;50(2):84-94. doi: 10.1258/msl.2010.009016.
6
The potential impact of an opt-out system for organ donation in the UK.英国选择退出式器官捐赠制度的潜在影响。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):534-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.031757.
7
Is an opt-out organ donation system desirable? Comments on a new law.退出式器官捐赠系统是否可取?对一项新法律的评论。
Clin Ter. 2016 Mar-Apr;167(2):38-9. doi: 10.7417/CT.2016.1919.
8
Opt-outs and upgrades. Ethics and law in the United Kingdom.退出与升级。英国的伦理与法律。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Jul;23(3):308-18. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000911.
9
Presumed consent will not automatically lead to increased organ donation.推定同意不会自动导致器官捐献数量增加。
Kidney Int. 2018 Aug;94(2):249-251. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.020.
10
Presumed consent for organ donation: a clinically unnecessary and corrupting influence in medicine and politics.推定器官捐赠同意:医学和政治中一种临床上不必要且具有腐蚀性的影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Dec;14(6):567-71. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-567.