• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中患者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的因子结构。

The factor structure of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in stroke patients.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Dankook University, Chungnam, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):54-62. doi: 10.1310/tsr1901-54.

DOI:10.1310/tsr1901-54
PMID:22306629
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in community-residing stroke patients.

METHODS

The sample for this study was a convenience sample of 203 persons who had experienced strokes and were in a convalescent center for the disabled and a primary care unit in Korea. Data were collected through a questionnaire that included the CES-D scale. Cognitive function was assessed by the validated Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K). The structure of the CES-D scale was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using SPSS 17.0 and Amos 7.0. The reliability of the CES-D scale was assessed by calculating the internal consistency of Cronbach's α.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 4-factor models did not show the adequate fit indices. Two competing factor models were tested by CFA for the entire sample after identifying the factor structure using EFA. The 5-factor structure (loss of vitality, positive affect, psychomotor retardation, negative affect, and interpersonal problems) supported and explained 61.25% of the variance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the CES-D scale is a useful depressive symptom screening tool for community-residing stroke patients. Identifying the psychometric properties of the CES-D scale would help health professionals to understand the comprehensive assessment of community-residing stroke patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨社区居住的中风患者中流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D)的结构因素。

方法

本研究的样本是 203 名经历过中风的人,他们在韩国的残疾人康复中心和初级保健单位。通过包括 CES-D 量表在内的问卷收集数据。认知功能通过经过验证的韩国版简易精神状态检查(MMSE-K)进行评估。使用 SPSS 17.0 和 Amos 7.0 通过探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)分析 CES-D 量表的结构。通过计算 Cronbach 的 α 来评估 CES-D 量表的可靠性。

结果

1、3 和 4 因子模型未显示出足够的拟合指数。在使用 EFA 确定因素结构后,对整个样本进行了 CFA 测试,以检验两种竞争的因子模型。5 因子结构(活力丧失、积极影响、精神运动迟缓、消极影响和人际关系问题)支持并解释了 61.25%的方差。

结论

本研究的结果表明,CES-D 量表是社区居住的中风患者有用的抑郁症状筛查工具。确定 CES-D 量表的心理测量特性将有助于卫生专业人员了解社区居住的中风患者的综合评估。

相似文献

1
The factor structure of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in stroke patients.脑卒中患者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的因子结构。
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;19(1):54-62. doi: 10.1310/tsr1901-54.
2
The Psychometric Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese Primary Care Patients: Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness.中国基层医疗患者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的心理测量学特性:因子结构、结构效度、信度、敏感性和反应性。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0135131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135131. eCollection 2015.
3
Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.法国临床及非临床成年人中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的心理测量特性
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2011 Oct;59(5):327-40. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2011.03.061. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
4
Rasch analysis of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale used for the assessment of community-residing patients with stroke.采用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评估社区居住的脑卒中患者:Rasch 分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(21-22):2075-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.560333. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
5
Depressive symptoms following natural disaster in Korea: psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.韩国自然灾害后的抑郁症状:流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的心理测量特性
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Nov 28;15(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0811-9.
6
Reliability and validity of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale in patients with systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症患者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的信度和效度
Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Mar 15;59(3):438-43. doi: 10.1002/art.23329.
7
Reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale in Serbian women with abnormal Papanicolaou smear results.塞族妇女巴氏涂片异常结果中心流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D)的信度和效度。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jul;29(6):996-1002. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000219. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
8
Screening value of the Center for epidemiologic studies - depression scale among people living with HIV/AIDS in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a validation study.越南胡志明市艾滋病病毒/艾滋病感染者中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的筛查价值:一项验证研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 13;16:145. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0860-3.
9
Factor analysis of the WeeFIM in children with spastic cerebral palsy.痉挛型脑瘫儿童 WeeFIM 的因子分析。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Aug;35(17):1466-71. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.737082. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
10
Race/ethnicity and the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: a meta-analysis.种族/民族与流行病学研究抑郁量表的因子结构:一项荟萃分析。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Oct;17(4):381-96. doi: 10.1037/a0025434.

引用本文的文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to performing dietary behaviors among chronic community-dwelling stroke survivors: A qualitative secondary analysis.慢性社区居住脑卒中幸存者进行饮食行为的促进因素和障碍:定性二次分析。
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jul;15(3):101270. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101270. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale among undergraduates and clinical patients.中文版本的流行病学研究抑郁量表(CES-D)在大学生和临床患者中的因子结构和测量不变性。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03474-x.
3
Factor Structure of the Short-Form of Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for People With Physical Disabilities.
针对身体残疾者的流行病学研究中心抑郁量表简版的因子结构。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 14;12:536499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.536499. eCollection 2021.
4
Effectiveness of paroxetine in the treatment of poststroke depression.帕罗西汀治疗脑卒中后抑郁的疗效
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11496. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011496.
5
Assessing the dimensionality of the CES-D using multi-dimensional multi-level Rasch models.使用多维多层次 Rasch 模型评估 CES-D 的维度。
PLoS One. 2018 May 25;13(5):e0197908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197908. eCollection 2018.
6
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressant treatment in poststroke depression: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.中风后抑郁症抗抑郁治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项多治疗方法的荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 3;7(8):e016499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016499.
7
An analysis of depressive symptoms in stroke survivors: verification of a moderating effect of demographic characteristics.中风幸存者抑郁症状分析:人口统计学特征调节作用的验证
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 8;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1292-4.
8
Reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among suicide attempters and comparison residents in rural China.中国农村自杀未遂者与对照居民中流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的信度和效度
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Apr 9;15:76. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0458-1.