• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被排除在社会保障之外:1998-2004 年挪威残疾抚恤金申请被拒。

Excluded from social security: rejections of disability pension applications in Norway 1998-2004.

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2012 Mar;40(2):142-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494811435497. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1177/1403494811435497
PMID:22307995
Abstract

AIMS

Admission to disability pension (DP) in Norway, like most other countries, requires a medical condition as the main cause of income reduction. Still, a widespread assumption is that much of the recruitment to the programme is rather due to non-medical, mainly labour market factors. In this article, we study the grey zones between acceptance and rejection of DP applications, in light of the concept of marginalisation.

METHODS

From the total Norwegian population, aged 18-66 in 1998, we included all first-time applications for DP between 1998 and 2004. Logistic regressions of both application and application outcome were then performed, controlling for a range of socioeconomic variables and medical diagnosis.

RESULTS

Medical diagnosis had the strongest impact on application outcome, together with the applicant's age. High rejection risk was found among applicants with complex musculoskeletal diagnoses, and also for complex psychiatric diagnoses as compared to well-defined ones. Persons having previously received social assistance more often applied for a DP and more often were rejected. The same is true, though on a lesser scale, for people with a weak affiliation to the labour market.

CONCLUSIONS

The DP programme in Norway is to a large degree medically oriented, not only judicially but also in practice. Nevertheless, non-medical factors have a bearing on both application rates and application outcome. The control system seems to work in a way that excludes the most marginalised applicants, thus possibly contributing to further marginalisation of already disadvantaged groups.

摘要

目的

在挪威,与大多数其他国家一样,获得残疾抚恤金(DP)需要将医疗状况作为收入减少的主要原因。尽管如此,人们普遍认为,该计划的大部分招募工作更多地是由于非医疗因素,主要是劳动力市场因素。在本文中,我们根据边缘化的概念,研究了 DP 申请被接受和拒绝之间的灰色地带。

方法

我们从 1998 年年龄在 18-66 岁的挪威总人口中,纳入了 1998 年至 2004 年期间首次申请 DP 的所有人。然后对申请和申请结果进行了逻辑回归,控制了一系列社会经济变量和医学诊断。

结果

医学诊断对申请结果的影响最大,其次是申请人的年龄。在患有复杂肌肉骨骼诊断的申请人中,以及在复杂精神科诊断与明确诊断相比,拒绝风险较高。以前接受过社会援助的申请人更经常申请 DP,被拒绝的情况也更多。对于与劳动力市场联系较弱的人来说,情况也是如此,尽管程度较小。

结论

挪威的 DP 计划在很大程度上是医学导向的,不仅在司法上,而且在实践中也是如此。然而,非医疗因素对申请率和申请结果都有影响。控制系统的运作方式似乎排除了最边缘化的申请人,从而可能导致已经处于不利地位的群体进一步边缘化。

相似文献

1
Excluded from social security: rejections of disability pension applications in Norway 1998-2004.被排除在社会保障之外:1998-2004 年挪威残疾抚恤金申请被拒。
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Mar;40(2):142-9. doi: 10.1177/1403494811435497. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
2
Predictors of disability pension in long-term sickness absence: results from a population-based and prospective study in Norway 1994-1999.长期病假中残疾抚恤金的预测因素:1994 - 1999年挪威一项基于人群的前瞻性研究结果
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Dec;14(4):398-405. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.4.398.
3
[What happens to patients not granted disability pension?].[未获得残疾抚恤金的患者会怎样?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1995 May 30;115(14):1754-8.
4
[More and more young people on disability pensions].越来越多领取残疾抚恤金的年轻人
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 May 10;121(12):1452-6.
5
Disability pension for psychiatric disorders: regional differences in Norway 1988-2000.精神疾病残疾抚恤金:1988 - 2000年挪威的地区差异
Nord J Psychiatry. 2006;60(4):255-62. doi: 10.1080/08039480600790010.
6
Changes in the prevalence of disability pension in Iceland 1976-1996.1976年至1996年冰岛残疾抚恤金患病率的变化。
Scand J Public Health. 2002;30(4):244-8. doi: 10.1080/14034940210133825.
7
Disability in society-medical and non-medical determinants for disability pension in a Norwegian total county population study.社会中的残疾——挪威一个县总人口研究中残疾抚恤金的医学和非医学决定因素
Soc Sci Med. 2004 May;58(10):1837-48. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00409-X.
8
Musculoskeletal impairments in the Norwegian working population: the prognostic role of diagnoses and socioeconomic status: a prospective study of sickness absence and transition to disability pension.挪威工作人群中的肌肉骨骼损伤:诊断和社会经济地位的预后作用:一项关于病假和转为残疾抚恤金的前瞻性研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jun 15;34(14):1519-25. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a8dee3.
9
Widespread pain and medically certified disability pension in the Hordaland Health Study.广泛的疼痛和医学认证的残疾抚恤金在霍达兰健康研究中。
Eur J Pain. 2012 Apr;16(4):611-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.08.005.
10
The importance of social characteristics of communities for the medically based disability pension.社区的社会特征对基于医疗的残疾抚恤金的重要性。
Eur J Public Health. 2004 Dec;14(4):406-12. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/14.4.406.

引用本文的文献

1
Disability insurance benefit application in Switzerland: an analysis of linked administrative and survey data.瑞士的残疾保险福利申请:关联行政和调查数据的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):982. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06992-2.
2
Physicians' attitudes to disability pension - impact of diagnosis: an experimental study.医生对残疾抚恤金的态度-诊断的影响:一项实验研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 5;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06043-2.
3
Consumption of psychotropic drugs among disability pension applicants with mental disorders: comparing awarded and rejected applicants in Finland.
精神障碍残疾抚恤金申请者的精神药物使用情况:比较芬兰的获批和拒批申请者。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;56(3):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01850-8. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
4
Prognostic factors for return to work, sickness benefits, and transitions between these states: a 4-year follow-up after work-related rehabilitation.工作相关康复治疗后 4 年随访:预后因素对重返工作岗位、病假福利以及这些状态之间转换的影响。
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):199-212. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9466-5.