Daemen College, Department of Psychology, 4380 Main St., Amherst, NY 14226, USA.
J Soc Psychol. 2012 Jan-Feb;152(1):1-4. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2011.565383.
We conducted a study to test the hypothesis that inferences about intentionality are biased toward an intentional interpretation. Contrary to previous research, participants were no more likely to judge ambiguous actions as intentional in a speeded compared to an unspeeded condition. Further, participants were faster to respond and more consistent in responding to unintentional rather than intentional actions.
我们进行了一项研究来验证这样一个假设，即关于意图的推断会偏向于有意图的解释。与之前的研究相反，与非加速条件相比，参与者在加速条件下不太可能将模棱两可的行为判断为有意的。此外，参与者对无意的行为反应更快，也更一致，而不是对有意的行为。
