Marincic Patricia Z, Ludwig Dawn B
Augsburg College Department of Physician Assistant Studies Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA.
J Physician Assist Educ. 2011;22(4):23-33. doi: 10.1097/01367895-201122040-00004.
The present study was conducted to gain comparative knowledge of physician assistants' and supervising physicians' perceptions of adequacy of physician assistant (PA) preparation at entry-level for effective practice in the primary care setting.
The sample included 1,000 PAs working in their first professional employment and their supervising physicians. Each PA/physician pair independently completed a survey to evaluate knowledge, skills, and patient care as well as diagnosis, management, and treatment of common conditions encountered in primary care. A 3-point scale for Entry-Level and Required Knowledge and Skills was used to assess proficiency: (1) exposed to subject area, but lack confidence in knowledge and/or practice skills; (2) have general knowledge and understanding of subject area and believe prepared for entry-level practice; and (3) have thorough knowledge of subject matter and expertise in practice. Competence was defined at 2.0.
Ten percent (n = 98) of PAs and 5% (n = 46) of physicians responded to the survey. PA means were below 2.0 in 13 of 31 medical knowledge and patient care competencies and four of five medical/surgical procedures evaluated. With regard to diagnosis, management, and treatment of common medical conditions, the PA ranking was > 2.0 in 17 of 18 competencies. Overall, physicians' ranking of PA preparations were higher than PA self-assessments, reaching significance in 13 of the 54 competencies.
While PAs were less confident and competent regarding entry-level medical knowledge and patient care, self-reported ability to diagnose, manage, and treat common conditions was ranked as competent for their current practice setting and met expectations of supervising physicians.
开展本研究以比较医师助理和指导医师对医师助理(PA)入门级准备是否足以在基层医疗环境中有效执业的看法。
样本包括1000名首次从事专业工作的医师助理及其指导医师。每对医师助理/医师独立完成一项调查,以评估知识、技能、患者护理以及基层医疗中常见病症的诊断、管理和治疗。入门级及所需知识和技能采用3分制来评估熟练程度:(1)接触过该学科领域,但对知识和/或实践技能缺乏信心;(2)对该学科领域有一般的知识和理解,并认为已为入门级实践做好准备;(3)对该主题有透彻的知识并在实践中有专业技能。能力水平定义为2.0。
10%(n = 98)的医师助理和5%(n = 46)的医师回复了调查。在评估的31项医学知识和患者护理能力中的13项以及五项医疗/外科手术中的四项中,医师助理的平均得分低于2.0。在常见病症的诊断、管理和治疗方面,医师助理在18项能力中的17项得分> 2.0。总体而言,医师对医师助理准备情况的评分高于医师助理的自我评估,在54项能力中的13项达到显著水平。
虽然医师助理对入门级医学知识和患者护理的信心和能力较低,但自我报告的诊断、管理和治疗常见病症的能力在其当前执业环境中被评为胜任,并符合指导医师的期望。