Suppr超能文献

用于向后四足行走的自适应控制。II. 后肢肌肉协同作用。

Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking. II. Hindlimb muscle synergies.

作者信息

Buford J A, Smith J L

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1568.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1990 Sep;64(3):756-66. doi: 10.1152/jn.1990.64.3.756.

Abstract
  1. To compare the basic hindlimb synergies for backward (BWD) and forward (FWD) walking, electromyograms (EMG) were recorded from selected flexor and extensor muscles of the hip, knee, and ankle joints from four cats trained to perform both forms of walking at a moderate walking speed (0.6 m/s). For each muscle, EMG measurements included burst duration, burst latencies referenced to the time of paw contact or paw off, and integrated burst amplitudes. To relate patterns of muscle activity to various phases of the step cycle, EMG records were synchronized with kinematic data obtained by digitizing high-speed ciné film. 2. Hindlimb EMG data indicate that BWD walking in the cat was characterized by reciprocal flexor and extensor synergies similar to those for FWD walking, with flexors active during swing and extensors active during stance. Although the underlying synergies were similar, temporal parameters (burst latencies and durations) and amplitude levels for specific muscles were different for BWD and FWD walking. 3. For both directions, iliopsoas (IP) and semitendinosus (ST) were active as the hip and knee joints flexed at the onset of swing. For BWD walking, IP activity decreased early, and ST activity continued as the hip extended and the knee flexed. For FWD walking, in contrast, ST activity ceased early, and IP activity continued as the hip flexed and the knee extended. For both directions, tibialis anterior (TA) was active throughout swing as the ankle flexed and then extended. A second ST burst occurred at the end of swing for FWD walking as hip flexion and knee extension slowed for paw contact. 4. For both directions, knee extensor (vastus lateralis, VL) activity began at paw contact. Ankle extensor (lateral gastrocnemius, LG) activity began during midswing for BWD walking but just before paw contact for FWD walking. At the ankle joint, flexion during the E2 phase (yield) of stance was minimal or absent for BWD walking, and ankle extension during BWD stance was accompanied by a ramp increase in LG-EMG activity. At the knee joint, the yield was also small (or absent) for BWD walking, and increased VL-EMG amplitudes were associated with the increased range of knee extension for BWD stance. 5. Although the uniarticular hip extensor (anterior biceps femoris, ABF) was active during stance for both directions, the hip flexed during BWD stance and extended during FWD stance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
摘要
  1. 为比较猫向后(BWD)和向前(FWD)行走时的基本后肢协同作用,从四只经训练能以中等步行速度(0.6米/秒)进行两种行走方式的猫的髋、膝和踝关节的特定屈肌和伸肌记录肌电图(EMG)。对于每块肌肉,EMG测量包括爆发持续时间、相对于爪子接触或离开时间的爆发潜伏期,以及爆发积分幅度。为将肌肉活动模式与步周期的各个阶段联系起来,EMG记录与通过对高速电影胶片进行数字化获得的运动学数据同步。2. 后肢EMG数据表明,猫的BWD行走的特征是与FWD行走相似的屈肌和伸肌交互协同作用,屈肌在摆动期活跃,伸肌在支撑期活跃。尽管潜在的协同作用相似,但BWD和FWD行走时特定肌肉的时间参数(爆发潜伏期和持续时间)以及幅度水平有所不同。3. 在两个方向上,当摆动开始时髋和膝关节屈曲时,髂腰肌(IP)和半腱肌(ST)都活跃。对于BWD行走,IP活动早期下降,随着髋伸展和膝关节屈曲,ST活动持续。相反,对于FWD行走,ST活动早期停止,随着髋屈曲和膝关节伸展,IP活动持续。在两个方向上,当踝关节屈曲然后伸展时,胫骨前肌(TA)在整个摆动期都活跃。对于FWD行走,在摆动结束时出现第二个ST爆发,此时髋部屈曲和膝关节伸展减慢以进行爪子接触。4. 在两个方向上,膝关节伸肌(股外侧肌,VL)的活动在爪子接触时开始。踝关节伸肌(外侧腓肠肌,LG)的活动在BWD行走的摆动中期开始,但在FWD行走中就在爪子接触之前开始。在踝关节,BWD行走时支撑期E2阶段(屈服)的屈曲最小或不存在,并且BWD支撑期的踝关节伸展伴随着LG-EMG活动的斜坡增加。在膝关节,BWD行走时的屈服也很小(或不存在),并且增加的VL-EMG幅度与BWD支撑期膝关节伸展范围的增加相关。5. 尽管单关节髋伸肌(股二头肌前部,ABF)在两个方向的支撑期都活跃,但BWD支撑期髋部屈曲,FWD支撑期髋部伸展。(摘要截断于400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验