Suppr超能文献

用于向后四足行走的自适应控制V. 双功能大腿肌肉的可变激活。

Adaptive control for backward quadrupedal walking V. Mutable activation of bifunctional thigh muscles.

作者信息

Pratt C A, Buford J A, Smith J L

机构信息

Department of Physiological Science, University of California, Los Angeles 90095-1568, USA.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1996 Feb;75(2):832-42. doi: 10.1152/jn.1996.75.2.832.

Abstract
  1. In this, the fifth article in a series to assess changes in posture, hindlimb dynamics, and muscle synergies associated with backward (BWD) quadrupedal walking, we compared the recruitment of three biarticular muscles of the cat's anterior thigh (anterior sartorius, SAa; medial sartorius, SAm; rectus femoris, RF) for forward (FWD) and BWD treadmill walking. Electromyography (EMG) records from these muscles, along with those of two muscles (semitendinosus, ST; anterior biceps femoris, ABF) studied previously in this series, were synchronized with kinematic data digitized from high-speed ciné film for unperturbed steps and steps in which a stumbling corrective reaction was elicited during swing. 2. During swing, the relative timing of EMG activity for the unifunctional SAm (hip and knee flexor) was similar for unperturbed steps of FWD and BWD walking. The SAm was active before paw lift off and remained active during most of swing (75%) for both forms of walking, but there was a marked decrease in EMG amplitude after paw off during BWD and not FWD swing. In contrast, the relative timing of EMG activity for the SAa and RF, two bifunctional muscles (hip flexors, knee extensors), was different for FWD and BWD swing. During FWD swing, the SAa and the RF (to a lesser extent) were coactive with the SAm; however, during BWD swing, the SAa and RF were active just before paw lift off and then inactive for the rest of swing until just before paw contact (see 3). Thus the swing-phase activity of the SAa and RF was markedly shorter for BWD than FWD swing. 3. Activity in SAa and RF was also different during FWD and BWD stance. The RF was consistently active from mid-to-late stance of FWD walking, and the SAa was also active during this period in some FWD steps. During the stance phase of BWD walking, however, the onset of activity in both muscles consistently shifted to early stance as both muscles became active just before paw contact (the E1 phase). Activity in RF consistently persisted through most of BWD stance. The duration of SAa recruitment during BWD stance was more variable across cats with offsets ranging from mid- to late stance. 4. The activation patterns of the biarticular anterior thigh muscles during stumbling corrective reactions were, in general, similar to their different activations during FWD and BWD swing. The initial response to a mechanical stimulus applied to the dorsum of the paw that obstructed FWD swing was an augmentation of knee flexion and increased activity in ST and SAm. A mechanical stimulus applied to the ventral surface of the paw to obstruct BWD swing resulted in an initial conversion of hip extension to flexion and a slowing of knee flexion. There was a corresponding recruitment of SAa and RF and an enhancement of background activity in SAm. 5. The two forms of walking are differentiated by posture and limb dynamics, yet muscles participating in the basic flexor and extensor synergies are unchanged. Although central pattern generating (CPG) circuits determine the basic timing of these synergies, changes in the duration and waveform of muscle activity may depend on unique interactions among the CPG, supraspinal inputs that set posture and the animal's goal (to walk BWD or FWD) and motion-related feedback from the hindlimb. Output mutability to each muscle may depend on the balance of this tripartite input; muscles with immutable patterns may rely heavily on input from CPG circuits, whereas muscles with mutable patterns may rely more on form-specific proprioceptive and supraspinal inputs.
摘要
  1. 本文是评估与向后(BWD)四足行走相关的姿势、后肢动力学和肌肉协同变化系列文章中的第五篇,我们比较了猫大腿前部三块双关节肌肉(前缝匠肌,SAa;内侧缝匠肌,SAm;股直肌,RF)在向前(FWD)和向后跑步机行走时的募集情况。这些肌肉的肌电图(EMG)记录,以及本系列先前研究的两块肌肉(半腱肌,ST;股二头肌前部,ABF)的记录,与从高速电影胶片数字化的运动学数据同步,用于无干扰步和摆动期间引发绊倒纠正反应的步。2. 在摆动期间,单功能SAm(髋和膝屈肌)的EMG活动相对时间在FWD和BWD行走的无干扰步中相似。SAm在爪子离地前活跃,并且在两种行走形式的大部分摆动期间(75%)都保持活跃,但在BWD摆动期间爪子离地后EMG幅度明显下降,而在FWD摆动期间则没有。相比之下,SAa和RF这两块双功能肌肉(髋屈肌、膝伸肌)的EMG活动相对时间在FWD和BWD摆动中不同。在FWD摆动期间,SAa和RF(程度较轻)与SAm共同活跃;然而,在BWD摆动期间,SAa和RF在爪子离地前刚活跃,然后在摆动的其余时间不活跃,直到爪子接触前(见3)。因此,BWD摆动时SAa和RF的摆动期活动明显比FWD摆动时短。3. SAa和RF在FWD和BWD站立期间的活动也不同。RF在FWD行走的站立中期到后期持续活跃,并且在一些FWD步中SAa在此期间也活跃。然而,在BWD行走的站立阶段,两块肌肉的活动起始一致地转移到站立早期,因为两块肌肉在爪子接触前(E1期)就开始活跃。RF的活动在BWD站立的大部分时间持续存在。BWD站立期间SAa募集的持续时间在不同猫之间变化更大,偏移范围从中期到后期。4. 在绊倒纠正反应期间,大腿前部双关节肌肉的激活模式总体上与它们在FWD和BWD摆动期间的不同激活情况相似。对施加到爪子背部阻碍FWD摆动的机械刺激的初始反应是膝关节屈曲增加以及ST和SAm活动增强。对施加到爪子腹面阻碍BWD摆动的机械刺激导致髋关节伸展初始转变为屈曲以及膝关节屈曲减慢。相应地募集了SAa和RF并且SAm的背景活动增强。5. 这两种行走形式通过姿势和肢体动力学区分,但参与基本屈肌和伸肌协同作用的肌肉没有变化。虽然中枢模式发生器(CPG)回路决定了这些协同作用的基本时间,但肌肉活动的持续时间和波形变化可能取决于CPG、设定姿势的脊髓上输入和动物目标(向前或向后行走)以及后肢的运动相关反馈之间的独特相互作用。每个肌肉的输出可变性可能取决于这种三方输入的平衡;模式不变的肌肉可能严重依赖CPG回路的输入,而模式可变的肌肉可能更多地依赖特定形式的本体感受和脊髓上输入。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验