Department of Endodontics, University of Turin Dental School, via Barrili 9, Turin, Italy.
Int Endod J. 2012 Jul;45(7):670-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02021.x. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
To report a case of apical fenestration and overfilling in which unusual pain characteristics made differential diagnosis challenging.
A 32-year-old woman with diffuse, spontaneous, moderate pain in the maxillary left posterior sector, exacerbated by masticatory and facial muscle movement, with intense sporadic electric-shooting pain, underwent clinical examination and 3D cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Apical fenestration with protrusion of the mesial root of tooth 26 beyond the buccal cortical plate, extrusion of canal filling material into the soft tissues and a periosteal reaction were detected. Surgery was performed under the operating microscope. The filling material and surrounding fibrous tissue were located, dissected from healthy soft tissues and removed. The mesiobuccal root apex was resected with a bur to within the bony crypt. A root end was prepared and filled with Tech Biosealer RootEnd™ (Isasan, Como, Italy). At the 2-week recall, the patient had complete resolution of the symptoms and good soft-tissue healing. The 1-year recall examination and intra-oral radiography confirmed complete resolution of the symptoms and health of periradicular tissues.
Apical fenestration may occur in 9% of cases and may be considered an anatomic predisposing factor for persistent pain after root canal treatment. This complication provides a considerable differential diagnostic challenge and is often misdiagnosed and mistreated. When correctly diagnosed through an accurate, multidisciplinary approach, it may be managed with a simple surgical procedure in which the endodontist should play a key role. Misdiagnosis and over treatment of apical fenestration, through the surgical management of chronic facial pain conditions, could lead to severe exacerbation of chronic pain, which may potentially become persistent or, indeed, intractable.
报告 1 例根尖开窗和超充病例,其不同寻常的疼痛特征使鉴别诊断具有挑战性。
1 例 32 岁女性,上颌左侧后牙区弥漫性、自发性、中度疼痛,咀嚼和面部肌肉运动加剧,伴有剧烈的阵发性电击样疼痛,行临床检查和 3D 锥形束 CT(CBCT)。发现 26 号牙近中颊根根尖开窗,颊侧皮质板外突,根管充填材料挤出至软组织,骨膜反应。在手术显微镜下进行手术。找到并从健康软组织中分离出充填材料和周围纤维组织,用涡轮机切除近颊根根尖,进入骨隐窝。用根管锉预备根尖并使用 Tech Biosealer RootEnd(Isasan,Como,意大利)填充。2 周复诊时,患者症状完全缓解,软组织愈合良好。1 年随访检查和口腔内放射影像学检查证实症状完全缓解,根尖周组织健康。
根尖开窗在 9%的病例中可能发生,可被认为是根管治疗后持续性疼痛的解剖学易感因素。这种并发症提供了相当大的鉴别诊断挑战,经常被误诊和误治。通过准确的多学科方法正确诊断,可以通过简单的手术治疗,其中牙髓病专家应发挥关键作用。根尖开窗的误诊和过度治疗,通过手术治疗慢性面部疼痛疾病,可能导致慢性疼痛严重恶化,可能持续存在或甚至变得难治。