Suppr超能文献

活体供者开放性肾切除术、手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术和全腹腔镜肾切除术的比较结果。

Comparative outcomes of open nephrectomy, hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, and full laparoscopic nephrectomy for living donors.

作者信息

Ungbhakorn P, Kongchareonsombat W, Leenanupan C, Kijvikai K, Wisetsingh W, Patcharatrakul S, Jirasiritam S

机构信息

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2012 Jan;44(1):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.026.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Kidney transplantation is a standard treatment for end-stage renal disease. There are many methods of harvesting kidneys from living donors. At present, the role of minimally invasive surgery, including hand-assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy, is well established and tends to replace open surgery at many institutions. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the outcomes of these operative procedures at Ramathibodi Hospital in Bangkok.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 200 patients who underwent open nephrectomy (ON), hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN), and full laparoscopic nephrectomy (FLN) between January 2006 and November 2010. Demographic data, type of surgical procedure, operative time, warm ischemic time (WIT), length of hospital stay (LOH), estimated blood loss (EBL), analgesic use, and complications from surgery were recorded. Results were compared using a one-way analysis of variance in order to determine differences.

RESULTS

During the study period, 200 living kidney donors underwent nephrectomy. Of these, 95 (47.5%) received ON, 23 (11.5%) received HALN, and 82 (41%) received FLN. The operative time for the patients who underwent HALN and FLN was statistically significantly longer than that of the patients who underwent ON. On the other hand, the EBL for the ON group was significantly greater than for the HALN and FLN groups. The WIT was shortest for the ON group, followed by the HALN and FLN groups. The LOH did not differ among the three groups. Analgesic use was significantly higher in the ON group. Surgical complications were identified in 24 patients (12%).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy is a relatively safe procedure when performed by experienced surgeons at appropriate institutions. Though the operative times and WITs were slightly longer and the cost was higher for the laparoscopic groups, the EBL was lower and the pain score was lower. Indeed, laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy is an attractive alternative surgical procedure. However, there is a long learning curve and experienced surgeons are required.

摘要

目的

肾移植是终末期肾病的标准治疗方法。从活体供体获取肾脏有多种方法。目前,包括手辅助和全腹腔镜肾切除术在内的微创手术的作用已得到充分确立,并且在许多机构有取代开放手术的趋势。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较曼谷拉玛提波迪医院这些手术操作的结果。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了2006年1月至2010年11月期间接受开放肾切除术(ON)、手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术(HALN)和全腹腔镜肾切除术(FLN)的200例患者。记录人口统计学数据、手术方式、手术时间、热缺血时间(WIT)、住院时间(LOH)、估计失血量(EBL)、镇痛药物使用情况以及手术并发症。使用单因素方差分析比较结果以确定差异。

结果

在研究期间,200例活体肾供体接受了肾切除术。其中,95例(47.5%)接受开放肾切除术,23例(11.5%)接受手辅助腹腔镜肾切除术,82例(41%)接受全腹腔镜肾切除术。接受HALN和FLN的患者的手术时间在统计学上显著长于接受ON的患者。另一方面,ON组的EBL显著高于HALN组和FLN组。ON组的WIT最短,其次是HALN组和FLN组。三组的LOH没有差异。ON组的镇痛药物使用显著更高。24例患者(12%)出现手术并发症。

结论

我们的结果表明,在合适的机构由经验丰富的外科医生进行腹腔镜活体供肾切除术是一种相对安全的手术。虽然腹腔镜组的手术时间和WIT稍长且费用较高,但EBL较低且疼痛评分较低。事实上,腹腔镜活体供肾切除术是一种有吸引力的替代手术方法。然而,学习曲线较长,需要经验丰富的外科医生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验