Viglione D J, Clemmey P A, Camenzuli L
California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.
J Pers Assess. 1990 Fall;55(1-2):52-64. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674046.
The Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ; Blatt, D'Afflitti, & Quinlan, 1976) is critically reviewed. First the developmental, object representations theory differentiating depression into anaclitic and introjective subtypes is presented. The DEQ factors of Dependency and Self-Criticism were initially found to be consistent with these clinically meaningful depressive subtypes. Subsequent research has generally demonstrated that these subtypes, at least as measured by the DEQ, do not hold up well in clinical populations. Furthermore, the validity of the developmental theory of these subtypes is weak. We suggest that more internally consistent and distinct factors should be developed from clinical populations because of their potential clinical usefulness.
对抑郁体验问卷(DEQ;布拉特、达菲利蒂和昆兰,1976年)进行了批判性综述。首先介绍了将抑郁症区分为依赖型和内摄型亚型的发展性客体表征理论。最初发现依赖和自我批评这两个DEQ因子与这些具有临床意义的抑郁亚型相符。后续研究总体表明,这些亚型,至少通过DEQ测量时,在临床人群中表现不佳。此外,这些亚型的发展理论的有效性较弱。我们建议,鉴于其潜在的临床实用性,应从临床人群中开发出更具内部一致性和独特性的因子。