Blaney P H, Kutcher G S
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124.
J Pers Assess. 1991 Jun;56(3):502-12. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5603_11.
Several theorists have posited two focuses for depressive experience and/or vulnerability: dependency and rejection, and self-criticism and failure. In turn, three instruments have emerged, each addressing these two components, respectively: the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ; Dependent and Self-Critical scales), the Sociotropy-Autonomy Scales (SAS), and the Anaclitic and Introjective Dysfunctional Attitude Scales (DAS). In this study, we addressed the relations within and among these three pairs of scales in a large undergraduate sample. Generally, the DEQ-Dependent, SAS-Sociotrophy, and DAS-Anaclitic scales showed substantial convergent and discriminant validity. Although this was true also for the DEQ-Self-Critical and DAS-Introjective scales, neither scale was closely related to the SAS-Autonomy scale, which appeared instead to be a better measure of counter dependency than a measure of self-critical, introjective features.
几位理论家提出了抑郁体验和/或易感性的两个焦点:依赖与拒绝,以及自我批评与失败。相应地,出现了三种工具,每种工具分别针对这两个组成部分:抑郁体验问卷(DEQ;依赖和自我批评量表)、社会依赖-自主量表(SAS)以及依恋性和内投性功能失调态度量表(DAS)。在本研究中,我们在一个大型本科样本中探讨了这三对量表内部及相互之间的关系。总体而言,DEQ-依赖量表、SAS-社会依赖量表和DAS-依恋性量表显示出显著的聚合效度和区分效度。虽然DEQ-自我批评量表和DAS-内投性量表也是如此,但这两个量表均与SAS-自主量表没有密切关系,相反,SAS-自主量表似乎是对抗依赖的更好衡量指标,而非自我批评、内投性特征的衡量指标。