Worldwide Comparative Medicine, GS&T, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 May;24(5):563-74. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328350916f.
Tumor recurrence and metastasis is the most common cause of mortality in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Despite positive results with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in preclinical studies using HCC xenograft models, the clinical outcome in HCC patients has been disappointing. So far, only the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sorafenib has been shown to significantly improve survival in HCC patients, suggesting that this class of agents could be effective against HCC. Recently, another VEGF inhibitor, sunitinib, showed survival benefits in HCC hepatitis B-positive patients, but failed to improve survival in HCC hepatitis C-positive patients. Obviously, concomitant liver disease, liver function in general, and the local liver environment have a huge impact on treatment outcomes. In this study, we aimed to examine the antiproliferative effect of sunitinib in different HCC cell lines in vitro, and then in xenograft and orthotopic models of HCC in order to assess the effect of the local liver vasculature on drug efficacy.
Human cancer cell lines Huh7.5, Hep3B, and SK-Hep-1 were used for in-vitro studies. In in-vivo studies, each mouse carried Huh7.5 cells in both the subcutaneous and the intrahepatic compartment; therefore, drug exposure and treatment regimen were identical in both tumors.
Sunitinib has the potential to moderately inhibit proliferation in the Huh7.5 cell line, induce p53 in the p53-wild-type cell line SK-hep-1, and to increase the S-phase and the sub-G1 component of the cell cycle in the Hep3B cell line. Diverse responses to sunitinib in HCC cell lines emphasize the heterogeneity of HCC tumors and may further explain the discrepancy between preclinical and clinical results. The in-vivo results show that sunitinib treatment was far less effective against intrahepatic tumors compared with xenografts. Histological data indicate that large solid intrahepatic tumors are severely affected by sunitinib as shown by large areas of necrosis and diminished number of viable tumor cells.
The real problem when treating intrahepatic tumors with sunitanib and/or other VEGF inhibitors seems to arise from unopposed local growth of the small tumors and perhaps the development of distant micrometastases. Even though both xenograft and orthotopic models have limitations, these models add value to our understanding of tumor biology and help to better design treatment paradigms for patients with HCC. In comparison with xenograft models, the orthotopic HCC model allows for a more realistic assessment of drug efficacy in patients, in particular by enhancing our knowledge of the role that organ vasculature plays in the development of local metastasis and tumor resistance to antiangiogenic treatments.
肿瘤复发和转移是肝细胞癌(HCC)患者死亡的最常见原因。尽管血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制剂在 HCC 异种移植模型的临床前研究中取得了积极的结果,但 HCC 患者的临床结果却令人失望。到目前为止,只有多靶点酪氨酸激酶抑制剂索拉非尼已被证明能显著改善 HCC 患者的生存率,表明这类药物可能对 HCC 有效。最近,另一种 VEGF 抑制剂舒尼替尼在乙型肝炎阳性 HCC 患者中显示出生存获益,但未能改善丙型肝炎阳性 HCC 患者的生存。显然,并存的肝脏疾病、一般肝功能和局部肝脏环境对治疗结果有巨大影响。在这项研究中,我们旨在体外研究舒尼替尼在不同 HCC 细胞系中的抗增殖作用,然后在 HCC 的异种移植和原位模型中评估局部肝脉管系统对药物疗效的影响。
使用人癌细胞系 Huh7.5、Hep3B 和 SK-Hep-1 进行体外研究。在体内研究中,每只小鼠的皮下和肝内均携带 Huh7.5 细胞,因此两种肿瘤的药物暴露和治疗方案相同。
舒尼替尼有可能适度抑制 Huh7.5 细胞系的增殖,诱导 p53 野生型 SK-hep-1 细胞系中的 p53,并增加 Hep3B 细胞系的 S 期和 sub-G1 细胞周期成分。HCC 细胞系对舒尼替尼的不同反应强调了 HCC 肿瘤的异质性,并且可能进一步解释了临床前和临床结果之间的差异。体内结果表明,与异种移植相比,舒尼替尼治疗对肝内肿瘤的效果要差得多。组织学数据表明,大的实体性肝内肿瘤受到舒尼替尼的严重影响,表现为大面积坏死和存活肿瘤细胞数量减少。
用舒尼替尼和/或其他 VEGF 抑制剂治疗肝内肿瘤的真正问题似乎是由于小肿瘤的局部生长不受抑制,以及可能发生远处微转移。尽管异种移植和原位模型都有其局限性,但这些模型增加了我们对肿瘤生物学的理解,并有助于更好地为 HCC 患者设计治疗方案。与异种移植模型相比,原位 HCC 模型更能真实地评估药物在患者中的疗效,特别是通过增强我们对器官脉管系统在局部转移和肿瘤对抗血管生成治疗的耐药性发展中所起作用的认识。