Wei Ting, Pearson Mike N, Armstrong Karen, Blohm Dietmar, Liu Jue
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Mol Biosyst. 2012 Apr;8(4):1325-38. doi: 10.1039/c2mb05300d. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
The factors that affect the formation and stability of DNA/DNA duplexes are complicated and still mostly unknown. In this study attempts were made to look for the crucial factor affecting hybridization failure in DNA microarray assays. A comprehensive range of factors were investigated simultaneously using a 25-mer oligonucleotide Potyvirus microarray. These included steric hindrance, direct/indirect labelling types, distance of a probe to the fluorescent labelling end, target (the DNA fragment used to hybridize with microarray probes) strand types either single strand or double strand, probes without mismatch and with different numbers of mismatch nucleotides (up to 36%) and different mismatch locations (5' end, centre and 3' end), probe GC content and T(m), secondary structures of probes and targets, different target lengths (0.277 kb to ~1.3 kb) and concentrations (0.1-30 nM). The results showed that whilst most of these known factors were unlikely to be the main causes of failed hybridization, there was strong evidence suggesting that the viral amplicon target structure is the most crucial factor. However, computing predicted target secondary structures by Mfold showed no correlation with the hybridization results. One explanation is that the predicted target secondary structures are different from the real structures. Here we postulate that the real target structure might be a combination of secondary structures resulting in a three-dimensional structure from exposure to three types of sub-structures: (1) a completely exposed linear structure to allow probes access for the successful hybridization and showing strong fluorescent signals; (2) a partially exposed structure to allow unstable binding and showing weak fluorescent signals; (3) a closed structure resulting in failed hybridization. These results are very important for microarray based studies as they not only provide an explanation for some current controversial results, but also provide potential resolution for the future studies. Due to the lack of available software for predicting the true target structure, development of microarrays should conduct an initial oligonucleotide probe selection procedure and those probes with capacity to hybridize with the target should be considered for the microarray development.
影响DNA/DNA双链体形成和稳定性的因素很复杂,目前大多仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们试图寻找影响DNA微阵列分析中杂交失败的关键因素。我们使用一个25聚体寡核苷酸马铃薯Y病毒微阵列同时研究了一系列广泛的因素。这些因素包括空间位阻、直接/间接标记类型、探针与荧光标记末端的距离、靶标(用于与微阵列探针杂交的DNA片段)的链类型(单链或双链)、无错配及具有不同错配核苷酸数量(高达36%)和不同错配位置(5'端、中间和3'端)的探针、探针的GC含量和熔解温度(Tm)、探针和靶标的二级结构、不同的靶标长度(0.277 kb至约1.3 kb)和浓度(0.1 - 30 nM)。结果表明,虽然这些已知因素中的大多数不太可能是杂交失败的主要原因,但有强有力的证据表明病毒扩增子靶标结构是最关键的因素。然而,用Mfold计算预测的靶标二级结构与杂交结果并无相关性。一种解释是预测的靶标二级结构与真实结构不同。在此我们推测,真实的靶标结构可能是二级结构的组合,由暴露于三种亚结构而形成三维结构:(1)完全暴露的线性结构,使探针能够成功杂交并显示强荧光信号;(2)部分暴露的结构,允许不稳定结合并显示弱荧光信号;(3)封闭结构导致杂交失败。这些结果对于基于微阵列的研究非常重要,因为它们不仅为当前一些有争议的结果提供了解释,也为未来的研究提供了潜在的解决方案。由于缺乏可用于预测真实靶标结构的软件,微阵列的开发应进行初始寡核苷酸探针选择程序,并且应考虑选择那些能够与靶标杂交的探针用于微阵列开发。