University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Dental School, Newark, NJ, USA.
J Public Health Dent. 2012 Winter;72(1):28-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00280.x. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
Previous studies demonstrated the efficacy of chairside medical screening by dentists to identify patients who are at increased risk for developing cardiovascular-associated events and the favorable attitude of dentists toward chairside medical screening. This study assessed patient attitudes toward chairside medical screening in a dental setting.
A self-administered questionnaire of eight five-point response scale questions was given to a convenience sample of adult patients attending an inner-city dental school clinic and two private practice settings. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests and t-tests were used to compare responses between study groups. Friedman nonparametric analysis of variance was used to compare response items within each question.
Regardless of setting, the majority of respondents was willing to have a dentist conduct screening for heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and hepatitis infection (55-90 percent); discuss results immediately (79 percent and 89 percent); provide oral fluids, finger-stick blood, blood pressure measurements, and height and weight (60-94 percent); and pay up to $20 (50-67 percent). Respondents reported that their opinion of the dentist would improve regarding the dentist's professionalism, knowledge, competence, and compassion (48-77 percent). The fact that the test was not done by a physician was ranked as the least important potential barrier. While all respondents expressed a favorable attitude toward chairside screening, the mean score was significantly lower among clinic patients across most questions/items. The priority rankings within an item were similar for both groups.
Acceptance by patients of chairside medical screening in a dental setting is a critical element for successful implementation of this strategy.
先前的研究表明,牙医通过椅旁医学筛查来识别心血管相关事件风险增加的患者是有效的,而且牙医对椅旁医学筛查持积极态度。本研究评估了患者在牙科环境中对椅旁医学筛查的态度。
采用 8 个 5 分制反应量表问题的自填式问卷,对参加城市内牙科学校诊所和两家私人诊所的成年患者进行了便利抽样调查。采用 Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney 检验和 t 检验比较研究组之间的反应。采用 Friedman 非参数方差分析比较每个问题内的反应项目。
无论在何种环境下,大多数受访者都愿意让牙医进行心脏病、高血压、糖尿病、人类免疫缺陷病毒感染和肝炎感染筛查(55%-90%);立即讨论结果(79%和 89%);提供口腔液、指尖血、血压测量、身高和体重(60%-94%);并支付最高 20 美元(50%-67%)。受访者表示,他们对牙医的专业精神、知识、能力和同情心的看法会有所改善(48%-77%)。测试不是由医生进行这一事实被认为是最不重要的潜在障碍。虽然所有受访者都对椅旁筛查持积极态度,但在大多数问题/项目中,诊所患者的平均得分明显较低。两组患者对项目内的优先顺序的评价相似。
患者在牙科环境中接受椅旁医学筛查是成功实施这一策略的关键因素。