Sinan Huseyin, Demirbas Sezai, Ozer Mustafa Tahir, Sucullu Ilker, Akyol Mesut
Departments of General Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182402448.
This prospective randomized study compared single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with respect to estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain levels, and complications. Thirty-four study patients were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients underwent SILC and 17 underwent LC. Operative time was longer for SILC than for LC, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the relationship of body mass index with operative time between SILC and LC (P=0.613, P=0.983, respectively). The 2 groups had no statistically significant differences with respect to visual analog scale scores, estimated blood loss, shoulder pain, or complications (P>0.05). SILC can be the treatment of choice for gallbladder disease. Although the surgeon's first several attempts at SILC require a longer operative time compared with LC, there are no differences in hospital length of stay, blood loss, complication rates, or pain scores between SILC and LC.
这项前瞻性随机研究比较了单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在估计失血量、手术时间、术后疼痛程度及并发症方面的差异。34例研究患者被分为两组:17例行SILC,17例行LC。SILC的手术时间比LC长,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。SILC和LC在体重指数与手术时间的关系上无统计学差异(分别为P=0.613,P=0.983)。两组在视觉模拟评分、估计失血量、肩部疼痛或并发症方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。SILC可作为胆囊疾病的治疗选择。虽然外科医生最初几次尝试SILC时手术时间比LC长,但SILC和LC在住院时间、失血量、并发症发生率或疼痛评分方面并无差异。