Suppr超能文献

单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

作者信息

Sinan Huseyin, Demirbas Sezai, Ozer Mustafa Tahir, Sucullu Ilker, Akyol Mesut

机构信息

Departments of General Surgery, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Feb;22(1):12-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182402448.

Abstract

This prospective randomized study compared single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with respect to estimated blood loss, operative time, postoperative pain levels, and complications. Thirty-four study patients were divided into 2 groups: 17 patients underwent SILC and 17 underwent LC. Operative time was longer for SILC than for LC, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the relationship of body mass index with operative time between SILC and LC (P=0.613, P=0.983, respectively). The 2 groups had no statistically significant differences with respect to visual analog scale scores, estimated blood loss, shoulder pain, or complications (P>0.05). SILC can be the treatment of choice for gallbladder disease. Although the surgeon's first several attempts at SILC require a longer operative time compared with LC, there are no differences in hospital length of stay, blood loss, complication rates, or pain scores between SILC and LC.

摘要

这项前瞻性随机研究比较了单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)和腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)在估计失血量、手术时间、术后疼痛程度及并发症方面的差异。34例研究患者被分为两组:17例行SILC,17例行LC。SILC的手术时间比LC长,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。SILC和LC在体重指数与手术时间的关系上无统计学差异(分别为P=0.613,P=0.983)。两组在视觉模拟评分、估计失血量、肩部疼痛或并发症方面无统计学差异(P>0.05)。SILC可作为胆囊疾病的治疗选择。虽然外科医生最初几次尝试SILC时手术时间比LC长,但SILC和LC在住院时间、失血量、并发症发生率或疼痛评分方面并无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验