Emergency Department, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emerg Med J. 2012 Dec;29(12):961-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200889. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
Paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning is the most common toxicological presentation in the UK. Doctors managing patients with paracetamol poisoning need to assess the risk of their patient developing hepatotoxicity before determining appropriate treatment. Patients deemed to be at 'high risk' of hepatotoxicity have lower treatment thresholds than those deemed to be at 'normal risk'. Errors in this process can lead to harmful or potentially fatal under or over treatment.
To determine how well treating doctors assess risk factor status and whether a standardised proforma is useful in the risk stratification process.
Retrospective 12-month case note review of all patients presenting with paracetamol poisoning to our large inner-city emergency department. Data were collected on the documentation of risk factors, the presence of a local hospital proforma and treatment outcomes.
249 presentations were analysed and only 59 (23.7%) had full documentation of all the risk factors required to make a complete risk assessment. 56 of the 59 (94.9%) had the local hospital proforma included in the notes; the remaining 3 (5.1%) had full documentation of risk factors despite the absence of a proforma. A local hospital proforma was more likely to be included in the emergency department notes in those with 'adequate documentation' (78 out of 120 (65%)) than for those with 'inadequate documentation' (16 out of 129 (12.4%)); X(2), p<0.001.
Despite a low overall uptake of the proforma, use of a standardised proforma significantly increased the likelihood of documentation of the risk factors which increase risk for hepatotoxicity following paracetamol poisoning.
对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)中毒是英国最常见的毒理学表现。管理对乙酰氨基酚中毒患者的医生需要在确定适当的治疗方法之前评估患者发生肝毒性的风险。被认为有肝毒性“高风险”的患者比被认为有肝毒性“正常风险”的患者的治疗阈值更低。这一过程中的错误可能导致治疗不足或过度,从而对患者造成伤害或潜在的致命风险。
确定治疗医生如何评估危险因素状况,以及标准化表格在风险分层过程中是否有用。
对我院大型市内急诊部门所有因扑热息痛中毒就诊的患者进行为期 12 个月的回顾性病历审查。收集了有关危险因素记录、当地医院表格的存在以及治疗结果的数据。
共分析了 249 例就诊,只有 59 例(23.7%)完整记录了所有危险因素,足以进行全面风险评估。59 例中有 56 例(94.9%)病历中包含当地医院的表格,其余 3 例(5.1%)尽管没有表格,但完整记录了危险因素。在有“充分记录”的患者(120 例中的 78 例(65%))中,比在有“记录不足”的患者(129 例中的 16 例(12.4%))中,更有可能将当地医院的表格纳入急诊部门的病历中;X(2),p<0.001。
尽管表格的总体采用率较低,但使用标准化表格显著增加了记录增加扑热息痛中毒后肝毒性风险的危险因素的可能性。