• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Is there still a place for gene patents in Australia? Implications of recent United States and European case law.

作者信息

Ridley Alexandra, Nicol Dianne

机构信息

Allens Arthur Robinson, Melbourne.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2011 Dec;19(2):282-99.

PMID:22320004
Abstract

This article considers the ramifications of recent United States and European litigation relating to patents claiming rights to genes associated with hereditary forms of breast cancer (the so-called BRCA genes) for recently commenced Australian litigation relating to the same subject matter. The article is contextualised with brief summaries of the relevant patent law, the science of genetics, the history of the BRCA genes and an overview of the activities of the patent holder. The analysis of first instance and appeal decisions on the validity of the United States BRCA patents shows the final outcome is still highly uncertain in that jurisdiction, while the European litigation provides little assistance in predicting the outcome of the Australian action. This article concludes that the outcome of the Australian litigation is an issue that cannot be determined with any certainty due to the lack of specific, relevant precedents both in Australia and in other jurisdictions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Is there still a place for gene patents in Australia? Implications of recent United States and European case law.
J Law Med. 2011 Dec;19(2):282-99.
2
Do patents impede the provision of genetic tests in Australia?专利是否阻碍了澳大利亚基因检测服务的提供?
Aust Health Rev. 2013 Jun;37(3):281-5. doi: 10.1071/AH13029.
3
The European opposition against the BRCA gene patents.欧洲对BRCA基因专利的反对。
Fam Cancer. 2006;5(1):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-2580-6.
4
Israeli doctors want to stop European patent for genetic test.以色列医生希望阻止一项基因检测的欧洲专利。
BMJ. 2005 Jul 2;331(7507):8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7507.8-a.
5
The continuing saga of patents and non-invasive prenatal testing.专利与非侵入性产前检测的持续纷争。
Prenat Diagn. 2019 May;39(6):441-447. doi: 10.1002/pd.5450. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
6
Myriad and the mass media: the covering of a gene patent controversy.麦利亚德公司与大众媒体:一场基因专利争议的报道
Genet Med. 2007 Dec;9(12):850-5. doi: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31815bf965.
7
Diagnostic testing of genetic disorders: limiting the scope of patent claims through disclosure requirements.遗传性疾病的诊断测试:通过披露要求限制专利权利要求的范围。
J Law Med. 2006 Aug;14(1):110-26.
8
Decoding gene patents in Australia.解读澳大利亚的基因专利
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014 Oct 3;5(1):a020909. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a020909.
9
Supreme Court ruling broadens BRCA testing options.最高法院裁决扩大了BRCA检测选项。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Nov 20;105(22):1671-2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt342. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
European opposition to exclusive control over predictive breast cancer testing and the inherent implications for U.S. patent law and public policy: a case study of the Myriad Genetics' BRCA patent controversy.欧洲对乳腺癌预测性检测独家控制权的反对以及对美国专利法和公共政策的内在影响:以Myriad Genetics公司的BRCA专利争议为例
Food Drug Law J. 2004;59(1):133-54.

引用本文的文献

1
Gene patents in the US--focusing on what really matters.美国的基因专利——关注真正重要的方面。
Genome Biol. 2012 Jun 29;13(6):161. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-6-161.