Suppr超能文献

腘动脉瘤开放手术与血管腔内治疗的早期和中期结果比较。

Comparison of early and midterm results of open and endovascular treatment of popliteal artery aneurysms.

作者信息

Pulli Raffaele, Dorigo Walter, Fargion Aaron, Pratesi Giovanni, Innocenti Alessandro Alessi, Angiletta Domenico, Pratesi Carlo

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;26(6):809-18. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.09.005. Epub 2012 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study was to retrospectively compare perioperative (<30 days) and 2-year results of open and endovascular management of popliteal artery aneurysms (PAAs) in a single-center experience.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2010, 64 PAAs in 59 consecutive patients were operated on at our institution; in 43 cases, open repair was performed (group 1), whereas the remaining 21 cases had an endovascular procedure (group 2). Data from all the interventions were prospectively collected in a dedicated database, which included main preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative parameters. Early results in terms of mortality, graft thrombosis, and amputation rates were analyzed and compared by χ(2) text or Fisher exact text. The surveillance program consisted of clinical and ultrasonographic examinations at 1, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Follow-up results (survival, primary and secondary patency, limb salvage) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves, and differences in the two groups were assessed by log-rank test.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the two groups in terms of sex, age, risk factors for atherosclerosis, and comorbidities; PAAs were symptomatic in 48% of cases in group 1 and in 29% in group 2 (P = 0.1). Fifteen patients with mild-to-moderate acute ischemia due to PAA thrombosis underwent preoperative intra-arterial thrombolysis, 13 in group 1 and 2 in group 2. In open surgery group, nine cases were treated with aneurysmectomy and prosthetic graft interposition, and in seven cases, the aneurysm was opened and a prosthetic graft was placed inside the aneurysm. In 27 cases, ligation of the aneurysm with bypass grafting (21 prosthetic grafts and 6 autologous veins) was carried out. In group 2, 20 patients had endoprosthesis placement, whereas in the remaining patient, a multilayer nitinol stent was used. There was one perioperative death in a patient of group 2 who underwent concomitant endovascular aneurysm repair and PAA endografting. Cumulative 30-day death and amputation rate was 4.5% in group 1 and 4.7% in group 2 (P = 0.9). Follow-up was available in 61 interventions (96%) with a mean follow-up period of 22.5 months (range: 1-60). Estimated primary patency rates at 24 months were 78.1% in group 1 and 59.4% in group 2 (P = 0.1). Freedom from reintervention rates at 24 months were 79% in group 1 and 61.5% in group 2 (P = 0.2); estimated 24-month secondary patency rates were 81.6% in group 1 and 78.4% in group 2 (P = 0.9), and freedom from amputation rates were 92.7% and 95%, respectively (P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment of PAAs provided, in our initial experience, satisfactory perioperative and 1-year results, not significantly different from those obtained with prosthetic open repair in patients with similar clinical and anatomical status. There is, however, a trend toward poorer primary patency rates among patients endovascularly treated, who also seem to require more frequently a reintervention.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是回顾性比较单中心经验中腘动脉瘤(PAA)开放手术和血管腔内治疗的围手术期(<30天)及2年结果。

方法

2005年1月至2010年12月,我院对59例连续患者的64个PAA进行了手术;43例采用开放修复(第1组),其余21例采用血管腔内手术(第2组)。所有干预的数据均前瞻性收集于一个专用数据库,该数据库包括主要的术前、术中和术后参数。通过χ²检验或Fisher精确检验分析并比较死亡率、移植物血栓形成和截肢率等早期结果。监测方案包括在1、6和12个月以及此后每年进行临床和超声检查。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线分析随访结果(生存率、原发性和继发性通畅率、肢体挽救情况),并通过对数秩检验评估两组之间的差异。

结果

两组在性别、年龄、动脉粥样硬化危险因素和合并症方面无差异;第1组48%的病例和第2组29%的病例中PAA有症状(P = 0.1)。15例因PAA血栓形成导致轻至中度急性缺血的患者接受了术前动脉内溶栓,第1组13例,第2组2例。在开放手术组,9例采用动脉瘤切除术和人工血管置换术治疗,7例切开动脉瘤并在瘤内置入人工血管。27例采用动脉瘤结扎并搭桥术(21例人工血管和6例自体静脉)。在第2组,20例患者置入了腔内移植物,其余1例患者使用了多层镍钛合金支架。第2组1例接受同期血管腔内动脉瘤修复和PAA腔内移植物植入的患者发生围手术期死亡。第1组30天累计死亡率和截肢率为4.5%,第2组为4.7%(P = 0.9)。61例干预(96%)有随访,平均随访期为22.5个月(范围:1 - 60个月)。第1组24个月时的估计原发性通畅率为78.1%,第2组为59.4%(P = 0.1)。第1组24个月时无需再次干预率为79%,第2组为61.5%(P = 0.2);第1组24个月时的估计继发性通畅率为81.6%,第2组为78.4%(P = 0.9),无需截肢率分别为92.7%和95%(P = 0.7)。

结论

在我们的初步经验中,PAA的血管腔内治疗提供了令人满意的围手术期和1年结果,与临床和解剖学状态相似的患者采用人工血管开放修复获得的结果无显著差异。然而,接受血管腔内治疗的患者原发性通畅率有降低趋势,且似乎更频繁地需要再次干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验