Department of Adult Psychiatry, Midwestern Regional Hospital, Limerick, Ireland.
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Mar;72(3):236-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.11.013. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
Motor-defined subtypes are a promising means of identifying clinically relevant patient subgroups but little is known about their course and stability during a delirium episode.
We assessed 100 consecutive adult palliative care patients with DSM-IV delirium twice weekly during their episodes using the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS), Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R98) and Cognitive Test for Delirium (CTD). DMSS subtypes were assigned for each assessment and analysed for stability within patients during episodes.
Across all assessments (n=303; mean 3 per patient, range 2-9), subtype occurrence was hypoactive (35%), mixed (26%), hyperactive (15%) and no subtype (24%). "No subtype" was associated with significantly lower DRS-R98 severity scores, of which 80% were subsyndromal, whereas mixed subtype assessments were the most impaired on the DRS-R98 and CTD. Subtypes were stable within delirium episodes in 62% of patients: 29% hypoactive, 18% mixed, 10% hyperactive and 6% no-subtype. The DRS-R98 noncognitive subscale scores differed across groups whereas cognitive subscale scores did not (p<0.001).
We conclude that motor subtypes occur in nearly all patients with full syndromal delirium and are often stable during an episode. Subtypes exhibited comparable levels of cognitive impairment but differed in non-cognitive symptoms, supporting the importance of cognitive testing to detect delirium in less overt cases.
运动定义的亚型是识别具有临床相关性的患者亚组的一种很有前途的方法,但在谵妄发作期间,它们的过程和稳定性知之甚少。
我们在谵妄发作期间每周两次使用谵妄运动亚型量表(DMSS)、修订版谵妄评定量表-98(DRS-R98)和谵妄认知测试(CTD)对 100 名连续的成年姑息治疗患者进行评估。为每次评估分配 DMSS 亚型,并分析患者在发作期间的稳定性。
在所有评估中(n=303;每位患者平均 3 次,范围 2-9),亚型发生率为低活动型(35%)、混合型(26%)、高活动型(15%)和无亚型(24%)。“无亚型”与 DRS-R98 严重程度评分显著降低相关,其中 80%为亚综合征,而混合亚型评估在 DRS-R98 和 CTD 上受损最严重。在 62%的患者中,亚型在谵妄发作期间稳定:29%的低活动型、18%的混合型、10%的高活动型和 6%的无亚型。DRS-R98 非认知子量表评分在各组之间存在差异,而认知子量表评分则没有(p<0.001)。
我们得出的结论是,几乎所有完全综合征性谵妄患者都存在运动亚型,且在发作期间通常较为稳定。亚型表现出相似水平的认知障碍,但在非认知症状上存在差异,支持认知测试在检测不太明显的病例中对识别谵妄的重要性。