Suppr超能文献

美国预防自杀基金会标准——给执法机构的一个教训。

The AFSP Standard - a lesson for law enforcement agencies.

作者信息

Doyle Sean, Doyle Dianne

机构信息

Linked Forensic Consultants Ltd., New Zealand.

出版信息

Sci Justice. 2012 Mar;52(1):17-9. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Abstract

Compliance with the AFSP (Association of Forensic Science Providers) Standard [1] which concerns the formulation of an evaluative opinion requires consideration of the defence case. This can be problematic for forensic scientists working with or for law enforcement agencies. Among the aims of law enforcement agencies is to secure a conviction while in many jurisdictions the forensic scientist owes an overriding duty to the Court. This casework report demonstrates that early consideration of the defence case by a forensic scientist complying with the AFSP Standard may help rather than hinder the prosecution. The dichotomy as to a conflict of interest for the scientist between supporting the police/prosecutors and being scientifically objective is shown to be a false dichotomy. Compliance with the Standard ensures that science is a better servant of justice.

摘要

遵守与形成评估性意见相关的法医科学提供者协会(AFSP)标准[1]需要考虑辩方的情况。这对于为执法机构工作或与执法机构合作的法医科学家来说可能是个问题。执法机构的目标之一是确保定罪,而在许多司法管辖区,法医科学家对法庭负有首要责任。这份案例工作报告表明,遵守AFSP标准的法医科学家尽早考虑辩方情况可能有助于而非阻碍检方。科学家在支持警方/检方与保持科学客观性之间存在利益冲突这种二分法被证明是错误的二分法。遵守该标准可确保科学更好地服务于正义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验