• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Fontan手术。与术后结果相关的血流动力学因素。

Fontan operation. Hemodynamic factors associated with postoperative outcomes.

作者信息

Mendoza Alberto, Albert Leticia, Ruiz Enrique, Boni Lorenzo, Ramos Victoria, Velasco Jose M, Herrera Dolores, Granados Miguel A, Comas Juan V, Perez Ana

机构信息

Instituto Pediátrico del Corazón, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012 Apr;65(4):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.11.018. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.recesp.2011.11.018
PMID:22325935
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The Fontan operation is usually the final palliative procedure in patients with univentricular heart. The objectives of this study were, firstly, to describe the clinical and haemodynamic characteristics of a group of patients with univentricular physiology who had previously been palliated with a bidirectional Glenn procedure and, secondly, to identify risk factors that can influence postoperative outcomes after the Fontan operation.

METHODS

Retrospective study with 32 patients who underwent a Fontan operation between March 2000 and December 2009. Clinical characteristics, catheterization data, type and duration of surgery were revised and analyzed as predictors of postoperative outcome.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 3%. After a median follow-up of 44 months (interquartile range, 32-79), survival was 90%. Preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (measured during catheterization) was correlated with late mortality. Of the remaining variables analyzed, the Nakata and McGoon indices, and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass showed the highest correlations with postoperative outcomes. Interventional catheterization before the Fontan operation was performed in 42% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital mortality after the Fontan operation was very low. The performance of a haemodynamic study before the Fontan operation made it possible to select high-risk patients for surgery as well as permitting the performance of interventional procedures that could improve postoperative outcome in these patients.

摘要

引言与目的

Fontan手术通常是单心室心脏患者的最终姑息性手术。本研究的目的,首先是描述一组曾接受双向格林分流术姑息治疗的单心室生理患者的临床和血流动力学特征,其次是确定可影响Fontan手术后预后的危险因素。

方法

对2000年3月至2009年12月期间接受Fontan手术的32例患者进行回顾性研究。对临床特征、导管检查数据、手术类型和持续时间进行回顾并分析,作为术后预后的预测因素。

结果

医院死亡率为3%。中位随访44个月(四分位间距,32 - 79个月)后,生存率为90%。术前平均肺动脉压(导管检查时测量)与晚期死亡率相关。在分析的其余变量中,Nakata指数和McGoon指数以及体外循环持续时间与术后预后的相关性最高。42%的患者在Fontan手术前进行了介入性导管检查。

结论

Fontan手术后的医院死亡率非常低。Fontan手术前进行血流动力学研究能够筛选出手术高危患者,并允许进行可改善这些患者术后预后的介入性操作。

相似文献

1
Fontan operation. Hemodynamic factors associated with postoperative outcomes.Fontan手术。与术后结果相关的血流动力学因素。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012 Apr;65(4):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.11.018. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
2
Pulmonary artery growth in univentricular physiology patients.单心室生理学患者的肺动脉生长。
Kardiol Pol. 2013;71(6):581-7. doi: 10.5603/KP.2013.0121.
3
Factors associated with prolonged recovery after the fontan operation.与Fontan手术后恢复时间延长相关的因素。
Circulation. 2008 Sep 30;118(14 Suppl):S171-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750596.
4
Cardiac magnetic resonance versus routine cardiac catheterization before bidirectional Glenn anastomosis: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.心脏磁共振与常规心导管术在双向 Glenn 吻合术前的比较:前瞻性随机试验的长期随访。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.12.079. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
[Pulmonary ventricle bypass operations].[肺动脉心室旁路手术]
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc. 2006 Apr-Jun;13(2):69-74.
6
Omission of a prior Glenn anastomosis is a risk factor for prolonged pleural drainage after the fenestrated extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure.未进行先前的格林分流术是开窗式心外管道Fontan手术后胸腔引流时间延长的一个危险因素。
J Card Surg. 2011 Sep;26(5):509-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2011.01291.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
7
Bidirectional Glenn and antegrade pulmonary blood flow: temporary or definitive palliation?双向格林分流术和顺行性肺血流:临时姑息治疗还是确定性姑息治疗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;85(4):1389-95; discussion 1395-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.01.013.
8
Risk factors for persistent pleural effusions after the extracardiac Fontan procedure.心外Fontan手术后持续性胸腔积液的危险因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004 Jun;127(6):1664-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.011.
9
Immediate results of bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis and Fontan operations in adults.成人双向腔肺吻合术和Fontan手术的即时结果
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;12(2):141-5. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.253484. Epub 2010 Nov 25.
10
Pulmonary vascular compliance and pleural effusion duration after the Fontan procedure.Fontan手术后的肺血管顺应性和胸腔积液持续时间
Int J Cardiol. 2009 Mar 20;133(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.11.083. Epub 2008 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
[Interventional catheterization in pediatric patients after Fontan procedure].[Fontan手术后小儿患者的介入导管插入术]
REC Interv Cardiol. 2023 Jul 12;6(1):46-48. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M23000394. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
2
A prospective study of risk factors associated with persistent pleural effusion after total cavopulmonary connection with special reference to serum cortisol level.一项关于全腔肺连接术后持续性胸腔积液相关危险因素的前瞻性研究,特别提及血清皮质醇水平。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jul;34(3):345-354. doi: 10.1007/s12055-017-0617-8. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
3
The Outcomes of Superior Cavopulmonary Connection Operation: a Single Center Experience.
上腔静脉肺动脉连接术的手术结果:单中心经验
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Nov-Dec;32(6):503-507. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0025.
4
Percutaneous interventions in Fontan circulation.Fontan循环的经皮介入治疗。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015 Jun 23;8:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.06.008. eCollection 2015 Sep 1.
5
Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography Improves Pre-operative Risk Stratification Before the Total Cavopulmonary Connection.斑点追踪超声心动图可改善全腔静脉肺动脉连接术前的风险分层。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 May;30(5):478-484. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 6.