• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对接受手术治疗的髋臼和骨盆骨折、无症状的患者行近端下肢深静脉血栓连续双重超声筛查。

Sequential duplex ultrasound screening for proximal deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures treated operatively.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 3635 Vista Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):443-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318241090d.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e318241090d
PMID:22327985
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence-based practice guidelines recommend against routine ultrasound screening for proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in asymptomatic pelvic fracture patients. However, the majority of trauma surgeons favor this practice. Furthermore, the timing of screening has been inconsistently described. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of sequential scans in asymptomatic acetabular and pelvic fracture patients treated operatively.

METHODS

In 2003, a screening protocol for DVT was begun for asymptomatic patients with these fractures treated operatively. Duplex ultrasound screening was used to evaluate the lower extremities for proximal DVT. Scans were to be obtained preoperatively and then postoperatively on the day before planned discharge from the hospital. A DVT prophylaxis protocol was also instituted. Between 2003 and 2007, 343 patients were identified for study. Patients were followed for thromboembolic complications for a minimum of 3 months.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-nine patients received both preoperative and postoperative scans. Of these, 35 patients (15%) had an asymptomatic DVT: 16 (7%) preoperatively and 19 (8%) postoperatively. Two patients (1%) with negative scans had a postoperative symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosed the day after surgery, but fatal PE did not occur. In the remaining 114 patients, 27 received a prophylactic inferior vena cava filter, 6 had a preoperative symptomatic DVT or PE before scanning, 25 received only the postoperative scan (3 being positive), and 56 were not scanned postoperatively. Of the 56 not scanned postoperatively, 2 (4%) were readmitted with a symptomatic proximal DVT but none for PE, and a fatal PE did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the possible diagnostic utility of sequential duplex ultrasound screening, it does not decrease the risk of PE in acetabular and pelvic fracture patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

背景

最近的循证实践指南建议,对于无症状骨盆骨折患者,不常规进行近端深静脉血栓(DVT)的超声筛查。然而,大多数创伤外科医生赞成这种做法。此外,筛查的时间也没有一致的描述。本研究的目的是检查连续扫描在接受手术治疗的无症状髋臼和骨盆骨折患者中的应用价值。

方法

2003 年,开始为接受手术治疗的这些骨折的无症状患者制定 DVT 筛查方案。使用双功能超声筛查来评估下肢近端 DVT。术前和计划出院前一天进行扫描。还制定了 DVT 预防方案。在 2003 年至 2007 年期间,确定了 343 名患者进行研究。对患者进行了至少 3 个月的血栓栓塞并发症随访。

结果

229 名患者接受了术前和术后扫描。其中,35 名患者(15%)出现无症状 DVT:术前 16 例(7%),术后 19 例(8%)。2 名(1%)阴性扫描的患者术后第二天诊断出有症状的肺栓塞(PE),但未发生致命性 PE。在其余 114 名患者中,27 名接受了预防性下腔静脉滤器,6 名在扫描前有术前症状性 DVT 或 PE,25 名仅接受了术后扫描(3 例阳性),56 名未接受术后扫描。在 56 名未接受术后扫描的患者中,2 名(4%)因症状性近端 DVT 再次入院,但无 PE 患者,也未发生致命性 PE。

结论

尽管连续双功能超声筛查可能具有诊断效用,但它并不能降低髋臼和骨盆骨折患者发生 PE 的风险。

证据等级

IV。

相似文献

1
Sequential duplex ultrasound screening for proximal deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients with acetabular and pelvic fractures treated operatively.对接受手术治疗的髋臼和骨盆骨折、无症状的患者行近端下肢深静脉血栓连续双重超声筛查。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):443-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318241090d.
2
Assessment of deep vein thrombosis using routine pre- and postoperative duplex Doppler ultrasound in patients with pelvic trauma : a prospective study.采用常规术前和术后双功能多普勒超声评估骨盆创伤患者的深静脉血栓形成:一项前瞻性研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Feb;104-B(2):283-289. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-0764.R2.
3
[Fatal risk thrombosis? A prospective study for the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in pelvic fractures].[致命风险血栓形成?骨盆骨折患者深静脉血栓形成发生率的前瞻性研究]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 May-Jun;147(3):293-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039227. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
4
Duplex ultrasound screening for deep vein thrombosis in asymptomatic trauma patients: a survey of individual trauma surgeon opinions and current trauma center practices.无症状创伤患者深静脉血栓形成的双功超声筛查:个体创伤外科医生观点及当前创伤中心实践的调查
J Trauma. 2011 Jan;70(1):27-33; discussion 33-4. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182077d55.
5
Enoxaparin treatment in high-risk trauma patients limits the utility of surveillance venous duplex scanning.依诺肝素治疗高危创伤患者限制了监测性静脉双功超声扫描的效用。
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Sep;34(3):447-52. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.117146.
6
Surveillance venous duplex is not clinically useful after total joint arthroplasty when effective deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis is used.当使用有效的深静脉血栓预防措施时,全关节置换术后的监测性静脉双功超声检查在临床上并无用处。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2004 Mar;18(2):193-8. doi: 10.1007/s10016-004-0009-6.
7
The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in the multiply injured patient with pelvic ring or acetabular fractures.骨盆环或髋臼骨折多发伤患者深静脉血栓形成的诊断
Orthopedics. 1995 Mar;18(3):253-7. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19950301-07.
8
Mechanical prophylaxis against deep-vein thrombosis after pelvic and acetabular fractures.骨盆和髋臼骨折后预防深静脉血栓形成的机械预防措施。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Jul;83(7):1047-51. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200107000-00010.
9
Long-term consequences of pelvic trauma patients with thromboembolic disease treated with inferior vena caval filters.接受下腔静脉滤器治疗的骨盆创伤合并血栓栓塞性疾病患者的长期后果。
J Trauma. 2008 Jul;65(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318075e97a.
10
Risk factors of venous thromboembolism in Indian patients with pelvic-acetabular trauma.印度骨盆髋臼创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Apr;19(1):18-24. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900105.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Screening for Venous Thromboembolism in Pelvic Trauma Patients: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study.盆腔创伤患者静脉血栓栓塞症筛查的作用:一项单中心回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 23;13(21):6347. doi: 10.3390/jcm13216347.
2
Analysis of the predictive value of microRNA-199b-5p combined with nitric oxide for venous thrombosis in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.分析 microRNA-199b-5p 联合一氧化氮对全膝关节置换术后静脉血栓形成的预测价值。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Aug 24;19(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04997-1.
3
Does Aspirin Provide Adequate Chemoprophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolic Events in Operative Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures?
阿司匹林能否为骨盆和髋臼骨折手术中的静脉血栓栓塞事件提供充分的化学预防?
Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):83-88.
4
Thromboembolic events in pelvic and acetabulum fractures: a systematic review of the current literature on incidence, screening, and thromboprophylaxis.骨盆和髋臼骨折中的血栓栓塞事件:对当前发病率、筛查和血栓预防文献的系统回顾。
Int Orthop. 2022 Aug;46(8):1707-1720. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05431-z. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Study of Deep Vein Thrombosis Screening by using Ultrasound Doppler in Patients with Pelvic and Acetabulum Fractures Requiring Operative Intervention.超声多普勒用于骨盆及髋臼骨折需手术干预患者深静脉血栓筛查的研究
Malays Orthop J. 2022 Mar;16(1):51-57. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2203.008.
6
Perioperative management of acetabular and pelvic fractures: evidence-based recommendations.髋臼与骨盆骨折的围手术期管理:循证推荐意见
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1311-1321. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04278-0. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
7
Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thrombosis in closed patella fracture: a prospective cohort study.闭合性髌骨骨折患者术前深静脉血栓形成的患病率及危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jun 23;16(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02558-4.
8
Higher altitude leads to increased risk of venous thromboembolism after acetabular and pelvic ring injury.海拔升高会增加髋臼和骨盆环损伤后静脉血栓栓塞的风险。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 May 26;19:192-195. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.05.026. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Thromboprophylaxis an update of current practice: Can we reach a consensus?血栓预防:当前实践的最新进展——我们能否达成共识?
OTA Int. 2019 Nov 22;2(4):e027. doi: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000027. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Incidence and risk factors for deep venous thrombosis of lower extremity after surgical treatment of isolated patella fractures.单纯髌骨骨折手术治疗后下肢深静脉血栓形成的发生率及危险因素
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 28;16(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02240-9.