Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术的疗效比较:随机对照试验和高质量非随机研究的荟萃分析。

Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):446-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824682f4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis of high-quality published trials, randomized and observational, comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND

Controversy persists about the clinical utility of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of gastric cancer. Prospective data is limited to a few small randomized trails.

METHODS

: Studies published from January 1992 to March 2010 that compare LDG and ODG were identified. No restrictions in pathologic stage were applied. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Selection of high-quality, nonrandomized comparative studies (NRCTs) was based on a validated tool (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies). Mortality, complications, harvested lymph nodes, operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were compared using weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were included in the analyses, 6 RCTs and 19 NRCTs, compromising 3055 patients (1658 LDG, 1397 ODG). LDG was associated with longer operative times (WMD 48.3 minutes; P < 0.001) and lower overall complications (OR 0.59; P < 0.001), medical complications (OR 0.49; P = 0.002), minor surgical complications (OR 0.62; P = 0.001), estimated blood loss (WMD -118.9 mL; P < 0.001), and hospital stay (WMD -3.6 days; P < 0.001). Mortality and major complications were similar. Patients in the ODG group had a significantly higher number of lymph nodes harvested (WMD 3.9 nodes; P < 0.001), although the estimated proportion of patients with less than 15 retrieved nodes was similar (OR 1.26, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

LDG can be performed safely with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than open surgery. The long-term significance of a difference of less than 5 nodes in the number of harvested lymph nodes remains unclear. Lymph node staging appears to be unaffected. These results need to be validated in Western patients with advanced gastric cancer.

摘要

目的

对高质量的已发表随机和观察性试验进行荟萃分析,比较腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)和开腹远端胃切除术(ODG)治疗胃癌的效果。

背景

微创技术治疗胃癌的临床应用仍存在争议。前瞻性数据仅限于少数小的随机试验。

方法

检索 1992 年 1 月至 2010 年 3 月期间发表的比较 LDG 和 ODG 的研究。不限制病理分期。所有随机对照试验(RCT)均被纳入。基于验证工具(非随机研究方法学指数)选择高质量的非随机对照研究(NRCT)。使用加权均数差值(WMD)和比值比(OR)比较死亡率、并发症、清扫的淋巴结数目、手术时间、出血量和住院时间。

结果

共有 25 项研究纳入分析,其中 6 项 RCT 和 19 项 NRCT,共包含 3055 例患者(LDG 组 1658 例,ODG 组 1397 例)。LDG 与较长的手术时间(WMD 48.3 分钟;P<0.001)和更低的总体并发症(OR 0.59;P<0.001)、内科并发症(OR 0.49;P=0.002)、较小的手术并发症(OR 0.62;P=0.001)、估计出血量(WMD-118.9 mL;P<0.001)和住院时间(WMD-3.6 天;P<0.001)相关。死亡率和主要并发症无差异。ODG 组清扫的淋巴结数目明显更多(WMD 3.9 个;P<0.001),但接受少于 15 个淋巴结清扫术的患者比例相似(OR 1.26,P=0.09)。

结论

LDG 与开腹手术相比,安全性相当,且术后住院时间更短,并发症更少。在清扫淋巴结数量上少于 5 个的差异的长期意义尚不清楚。淋巴结分期似乎不受影响。这些结果需要在患有晚期胃癌的西方患者中进行验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验