[Clinical analysis between "early" versus "late" liver retransplantation].

OBJECTIVE

To compare early and late orthotopic liver retransplantation (re-OLT) for patients with poor graft function after primary transplantation at our center and sum up our clinical experience in re-OLT.

METHODS

The clinical data of 36 re-OLTs from January 2004 to July 2009 were analyzed retrospectively, consisting of the first group with 17 cases of early re-OLT and the second group with 19 cases of late re-OLT. The average ages were (45 ± 13) years and (48 ± 10) years, and the time intervals were (49 ± 54) days and (514 ± 342) days in early re-OLT group and late re-OLT group, respectively.

RESULTS

Biliary tract complications were the main indications for early re-OLT and late re-OLT. Other common indications were vascular complications in early re-OLT and recurrence of primary diseases in late re-OLT. No significant differences were found between the groups with regard to the volume of bleeding during operation, cold ischemia time, operative duration and perioperative mortality except the MELD score. Outcome was fatal for 8 patients in early re-OLT and 10 patients in late re-OLT. Three deaths were due to severe sepsis-related disease, 3 deaths due to multiple organ failure in early re-OLT and 4 deaths due to severe sepsis-related disease, 3 deaths due to recurrence of HCC in late re-OLT. One and 2-year actuarial survival rates after re-OLT were 52.9% and 41.2%, respectively, for patients in early re-OLT, and 63.2% and 52.6%, respectively, for patients in late re-OLT. No significant differences were found regarding survival rates between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The similar clinical results can be achieved in early and late re-OLT. Proper indications and optimal operation timing, experienced surgical procedures and effective perioperative anti-infection strategy contribute to the improvement of the overall survival rate of the patients after re-OLT.