Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):563-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.063. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
This study sought to evaluate the performance of microaxial ventricular assist devices for the purposes of supporting failing Fontan physiology by decreasing central venous pressure.
Three Abiomed Impella pumps (Abiomed, Inc, Danvers, Mass) were evaluated in a mock circulatory system of the Fontan circuit. The local response of pressures and flows to pump function was assessed as a function of pump speed and pulmonary vascular resistance at a high baseline central venous pressure. For one device, subsequent modeling studies were conducted using a lumped parameter model of the single ventricle circuit.
The left ventricular devices (Impella 2.5, 5.0) were shown to be suboptimal as single device solutions for cavopulmonary support. The small area of these devices relative to vessel diameter led to significant flow recirculation without an obstructive separator in place. Furthermore, downstream pressure augmentation adversely affected the pressure in the superior vena cava. The use of 2 devices would be mandatory for successful support. The right-sided device (Impella RP), whose outflow was positioned in the left pulmonary artery, demonstrated decreased flow recirculation and did not impede superior caval venous flow. Although static pressure is still required to drive flow through the opposite lung, numeric modeling demonstrated the potential for modest but significant improvements in lowering the central venous pressure (2-8 mm Hg).
Left-sided microaxial pumps are not well suited for cavopulmonary support because of severe flow recirculation and the need for multiple devices. The right-ventricular Impella device provides improved performance by directing flow into the pulmonary artery, resulting in modest decreases in central venous pressure.
本研究旨在评估微型轴流式心室辅助装置的性能,通过降低中心静脉压来支持衰竭的 Fontan 生理功能。
在 Fontan 循环的模拟循环系统中评估了 3 个雅培 Impella 泵(雅培公司,马萨诸塞州丹弗斯)。评估了在较高的基础中心静脉压下,泵速和肺血管阻力对泵功能的局部压力和流量响应。对于一种设备,随后使用单心室回路的集中参数模型进行了建模研究。
左心室设备(Impella 2.5、5.0)作为单设备腔静脉支持的解决方案并不理想。这些设备相对于血管直径的小面积导致了严重的流量再循环,而没有放置阻塞性隔离器。此外,下游压力增强会对上腔静脉的压力产生不利影响。为了成功支持,必须使用 2 个设备。位于左肺动脉的右侧设备(Impella RP),其流出物,表现出减少的流量再循环,并且不会阻碍上腔静脉血流。虽然仍需要静态压力来驱动另一侧肺的流动,但数值模拟表明,降低中心静脉压(2-8mmHg)具有适度但显著的改善潜力。
由于严重的流量再循环和需要多个设备,左侧微型轴流式泵不适合腔静脉支持。右心室 Impella 装置通过将血流引导到肺动脉,从而改善了性能,导致中心静脉压适度降低。