Suppr超能文献

一项关于利益相关者对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者社区预瞻性护理服务看法的定性研究。

A qualitative study of stakeholder views of a community-based anticipatory care service for patients with COPD.

作者信息

Cleland Jennifer, Moffat Mandy, Small Iain

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Foresterhill Health Centre, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Sep;21(3):255-60. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need to consider anticipatory preventive care for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been highlighted in UK guidelines and policy.

AIMS

To explore stakeholder views of the utility and design of a community-based anticipatory care service (CBACS) for COPD.

METHODS

This was a qualitative study using focus groups and in-depth interviews in North-East Scotland. Key stakeholders were purposively sampled: GPs (n=7), practice nurses (n=6), community nurses (n=4), district nurses (n=6), physiotherapists (n=6), pharmacists (n=8), COPD Managed Clinical Network members (n=8), NHS managers (n=4), the COPD Early Supported Discharge (ESD) Team (n=7), patients and carers (n=7). Data were analysed using framework analysis.

RESULTS

A CBACS for COPD was broadly acceptable to most participants although not all wished direct involvement. Patient education and empowerment, clear roles, effective communication across traditional service boundaries, generic and clinical skills training, ongoing support and a holistic service were seen as crucial. Potential issues included: resources; anticipatory care being in conflict with the 'reactive' ethos of NHS care; and the breadth of clinical knowledge required.

CONCLUSION

A CBACS for COPD requires additional resources and professionals will need to adapt to a new model of service delivery for which they may not be ready.

摘要

背景

英国的指南和政策强调了对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行预期性预防护理的必要性。

目的

探讨利益相关者对COPD社区预期护理服务(CBACS)的效用和设计的看法。

方法

这是一项在苏格兰东北部进行的定性研究,采用焦点小组和深入访谈的方法。关键利益相关者通过目的抽样选取:全科医生(n = 7)、执业护士(n = 6)、社区护士(n = 4)、 district护士(n = 6)、物理治疗师(n = 6)、药剂师(n = 8)、COPD管理临床网络成员(n = 8)、NHS管理人员(n = 4)、COPD早期支持出院(ESD)团队(n = 7)、患者及其护理人员(n = 7)。数据采用框架分析法进行分析。

结果

大多数参与者对COPD的CBACS基本接受,尽管并非所有人都希望直接参与。患者教育与赋权、明确的角色、跨越传统服务界限的有效沟通、通用和临床技能培训、持续支持以及整体服务被视为至关重要。潜在问题包括:资源;预期护理与NHS护理的“反应性”理念相冲突;以及所需临床知识的广度。

结论

COPD的CBACS需要额外的资源,专业人员需要适应一种他们可能尚未准备好的新服务提供模式。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Self-management education for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的自我管理教育
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD002990. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002990.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验