St Andrew's Academic Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Northampton, UK.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012 Oct;15(9):1351-71. doi: 10.1017/S146114571100201X. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
Reducing the risk of violent and aggressive behaviour in patients with schizophrenia remains a clinical priority. There is emerging evidence to suggest that the second-generation antipsychotic, clozapine, is effective at reducing this risk in patients with schizophrenia and some evidence to suggest that it may be best in selected patients. We conducted a systematic literature search in March 2011 of all prospective and retrospective studies, which investigated clozapine's anti-aggressive effects in a variety of mental disorders. The review identified six animal studies, four randomized controlled trials, 12 prospective non-controlled studies and 22 retrospective studies, with four case studies. We found considerable evidence in support of clozapine's ability to reduce violent and aggressive behaviour. Clozapine's anti-aggressive effect was most commonly explored in patients with schizophrenia, with less evidence available for other psychiatric disorders, including borderline personality disorder, autistic spectrum disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and learning disability. There was mixed evidence to address the question of whether or not clozapine was any more effective than other antipsychotics. In the case of schizophrenia, there was evidence to suggest that clozapine's anti-aggressive effect was more marked particularly in those with treatment-resistant illness. Its anti-aggressive effects appeared to be 'specific', being to some extent greater than both its more general antipsychotic and sedative effects. There were significant methodological inconsistencies in the studies we identified, particularly surrounding patient recruitment criteria, the definition and measurement of violence and the lack of randomized, controlled trials. Data on therapeutic monitoring were also limited. Clozapine can reduce violence and persistent aggression in patients with schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders. It may offer an advantage over other antipsychotics, although perhaps exclusively in the case of traditionally defined 'treatment resistance' or more broadly defined 'complex cases' with co-morbidity. Larger, randomized, blinded, controlled studies with robust characterization of participants, and standardized measures of violence and aggression are, however, needed to fully understand this link and explore the possible mechanisms.
降低精神分裂症患者暴力和攻击行为的风险仍然是临床重点。有新的证据表明,第二代抗精神病药氯氮平可有效降低精神分裂症患者的这种风险,并有一些证据表明,氯氮平可能对某些特定患者效果最佳。我们于 2011 年 3 月对所有前瞻性和回顾性研究进行了系统的文献检索,以调查氯氮平在各种精神障碍中的抗攻击作用。综述确定了 6 项动物研究、4 项随机对照试验、12 项前瞻性非对照研究和 22 项回顾性研究,其中包括 4 项病例研究。我们发现了大量证据支持氯氮平降低暴力和攻击行为的能力。氯氮平的抗攻击作用最常被探索应用于精神分裂症患者,而其他精神障碍(包括边缘型人格障碍、自闭症谱系障碍、创伤后应激障碍、双相情感障碍和学习障碍)的证据较少。对于氯氮平是否比其他抗精神病药更有效这一问题,有一些证据表明其具有混合效果。在精神分裂症的情况下,有证据表明氯氮平的抗攻击作用更为显著,特别是对于那些患有难治性疾病的患者。其抗攻击作用似乎具有“特异性”,在某种程度上比其更一般的抗精神病作用和镇静作用更强。我们确定的研究存在显著的方法学不一致性,特别是在患者招募标准、暴力的定义和测量以及缺乏随机对照试验方面。治疗监测数据也有限。氯氮平可以降低精神分裂症和其他精神障碍患者的暴力和持续攻击行为。它可能优于其他抗精神病药,尽管可能仅在传统定义的“治疗抵抗”或更广泛定义的“伴有合并症的复杂病例”的情况下。然而,需要进行更大规模、随机、盲法、对照研究,以充分了解这种关联并探索可能的机制,这些研究需要对参与者进行强有力的特征描述,以及对暴力和攻击行为进行标准化测量。