Laboratory for Human Brain Dynamics, AAI Scientific Cultural Services Ltd., Galaxias Center Office 501, 33 Arch. Makarios III Avenue, Nicosia 1065, Cyprus.
Neuroimage. 2012 Apr 15;60(3):1638-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.121. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
Different attention types select and focus brain resources on relevant sensory information. However, key questions remain unresolved: when and where cortical visual processing is first modulated by different types of attention? How do such modulatory effects spread thereafter? Here, we address these issues for spatial and category-specific types of attention using magnetoencephalography (MEG). First we identified the dynamics of visual attention-independent sensory processing to serve as a baseline framework for the attentional modulations of interest. We found that visual information is processed through the entire hierarchy of visual areas in at least two phases, in the 40-130 ms and 130-230 ms periods respectively. Spatial attention modulations were identified from the beginning of the initial stimulus-evoked response in the primary visual cortex ~70 ms post-stimulus. Category-specific attention modulated face processing beginning from the first face-specific response in high-level object-related areas ~100 ms post-stimulus, substantially earlier than previously reported for face-directed attention. Thus both attention types modulated responses during the first processing phase, beginning at the earliest brain area capable of coding the attentional target. Thereafter attentional effects propagated through the visual cortex together with the stimulus-evoked activity. Category-specific attention did not affect the first-phase responses in low-level strongly retinotopic visual areas, while the second-phase responses were enhanced when the stimulus was the response target and reduced when it was a distractor. Responses during both phases in high-level object-related areas were enhanced by category-specific attention independent of their target/distractor status. Spatial attention effects were stronger in low-level areas, whereas category-specific attention effects were stronger in high-level object-related areas.
不同类型的注意力选择并集中大脑资源于相关的感觉信息。然而,一些关键问题仍未得到解决:不同类型的注意力何时以及在何处首次调节皮质视觉处理?此后,这些调节效应如何传播?在这里,我们使用脑磁图(MEG)来解决空间和类别特定类型注意力的这些问题。首先,我们确定了与注意力无关的感觉处理的动力学,以作为感兴趣的注意力调制的基线框架。我们发现,视觉信息至少通过两个阶段在视觉区域的整个层次结构中进行处理,分别在 40-130ms 和 130-230ms 期间。空间注意力调制从初级视觉皮层中初始刺激诱发反应的开始就被识别出来,刺激后约 70ms。类别特定的注意力从高水平与物体相关区域中第一个特定于面部的反应开始调制面部处理,刺激后约 100ms,这比以前报道的面部定向注意力要早得多。因此,两种注意力类型都在第一个处理阶段开始时调制反应,从最早能够编码注意力目标的大脑区域开始。此后,注意力效应与刺激诱发活动一起在视觉皮层中传播。类别特定的注意力不会影响低水平强视网膜定位的视觉区域的第一阶段反应,而当刺激是反应目标时,第二阶段反应会增强,当刺激是分心物时,第二阶段反应会减弱。在与物体相关的高水平区域中的两个阶段的反应都通过类别特定的注意力增强,而与它们的目标/分心物状态无关。空间注意力效应在低水平区域更强,而类别特定的注意力效应在与物体相关的高水平区域更强。