Mun Soo-Hyun
Division of General Studies, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Korea.
Uisahak. 2011 Dec 31;20(2):555-89.
This paper aimed to examine the debate over the fertility decline in the German Empire, focusing on the role of the SPD. During the German Empire, the fertility rate dramatically declined and the growing awareness of a continuous decline in the birth rate prompted a massive debate among politicians, doctors, sociologists, and feminist activists. The fertility decline was negatively evaluated and generated consciousness of crisis. However, it was not the only way to face this new phenomenon. Indeed, the use of birth control among the upper class was interpreted as a part of a modernizing process. As the same phenomenon reached the working class, it suddenly became a social problem and was attributed to the SPD. The debate over the fertility decline in imperial German society ridden with a fierce class conflict was developed into a weapon against the SPD. Contrary to the assumption of conservative politicians, the SPD had no clear-cut position on this issue. Except for a few politicians like Kautsky and the doctors who came into frequent contact with the workers, the "birth strike" was not listed as the main interest of the SPD. Even Clara Zetkin, the leader of the Social Democratic women's organization viewed it as a concern of the individual person which could not be incorporated in the party program. The women's organization of the SPD put priority on class conflict rather than issues specific to women. As a result, the debate over the birth rate decline within the SPD was not led by the women themselves. There could have been various means to stimulate the birth rate. Improvement in the welfare system, such as tax relief for large families, better housing conditions, and substantial maternity protection, could have been feasible solutions to the demographic crisis. However, Germany chose to respond to this crisis by imposing legal sanctions against birth control. In addition to paragraphs 218-220 of the German criminal law enacted in 1872 which prescribed penal servitude for anyone who had an abortion or people who helped to practice it, Paragraph 184.3 of the civil code was enacted in order to outlaw the advertising, display, and publicizing of contraceptives with an 'indecent' intention, although selling or manufacturing contraceptives was not forbidden. Such a punitive approach was especially preferred by the government and conservative parties because it was easy to implement and "cheap" in comparison with the comprehensive social welfare program. What made the SPD different from other conservative parties was the fact that the SPD opposed the government's attempt to prohibit contraception by means of strengthening a penal code. According to the SPD, it was not only morally unacceptable, but also technically impossible for the government to intervene in family limitation. Moreover, politicians from the SPD criticized that such a punitive policy targeted the working class because the upper echelon of the society could easily evade the ban on contraceptives. However, the SPD did not proceed to draft comprehensive social welfare measures in order to fight the fertility decline. The miserable condition of working class women remained as an invisible social phenomenon even within the SPD. The German women who could not find the proper means to practice contraception were driven to have abortions. Annually, hundreds of the women were accused of practicing abortion and imprisoned. In sum, German society ran about in confusion and did not know how to properly respond to the unprecedented decline in fertility. By defining the fertility decline just as a social disease due to moral decay and influence of socialism, German society lost a chance to rationalize itself. Given that women, the main actors, had no way to take part in the debate over this issue, it is not surprising that German society fought against the symptom of the disease, not against its root.
本文旨在审视德意志帝国时期关于生育率下降的争论,重点关注社会民主党(SPD)所扮演的角色。在德意志帝国时期,生育率急剧下降,而人们日益意识到出生率持续下滑,这引发了政治家、医生、社会学家和女权主义活动家之间的大规模辩论。生育率下降受到负面评价,并引发了危机意识。然而,这并非应对这一新现象的唯一方式。事实上,上层阶级使用节育措施被视为现代化进程的一部分。当同样的现象在工人阶级中出现时,它突然变成了一个社会问题,并被归咎于社会民主党。在充满激烈阶级冲突的德意志帝国社会中,关于生育率下降的辩论演变成了对付社会民主党人的一件武器。与保守派政治家的假设相反,社会民主党在这个问题上没有明确立场。除了考茨基等少数政治家以及那些经常与工人接触的医生外,“生育罢工”并未被列为社会民主党关注的主要问题。就连社会民主妇女组织的领导人克拉拉·蔡特金也认为这是个人的事情,不能纳入政党纲领。社会民主党妇女组织将阶级冲突置于优先地位,而非妇女的具体问题。结果,社会民主党内部关于出生率下降的辩论并非由女性自身主导。本可以有多种刺激出生率的方法。改善福利制度,比如为大家庭减免税收、改善住房条件以及提供充足的产妇保护,本可以成为应对人口危机的可行解决方案。然而,德国选择通过对节育措施实施法律制裁来应对这一危机。除了1872年颁布的德国刑法第218 - 220条规定对任何实施堕胎或协助堕胎者处以苦役外,民法典第184.3条也被颁布,目的是将出于“不道德”意图宣传、展示和推广避孕用品定为非法行为,尽管销售或制造避孕用品并不被禁止。这样一种惩罚性的做法尤其受到政府和保守党的青睐,因为与全面的社会福利计划相比,它易于实施且“成本低廉”。社会民主党与其他保守党的不同之处在于,社会民主党反对政府试图通过强化刑法来禁止避孕。据社会民主党称,政府干预家庭生育限制不仅在道德上不可接受,而且在技术上也不可能。此外,社会民主党政治家批评说,这种惩罚性政策针对的是工人阶级,因为社会上层能够轻易规避避孕用品禁令。然而,社会民主党并未着手起草全面的社会福利措施来应对生育率下降问题。即使在社会民主党内部,工人阶级女性的悲惨处境仍然是一个无形的社会现象。那些找不到合适避孕方法的德国女性被迫去堕胎。每年都有数百名女性被指控实施堕胎并被监禁。总之,德国社会一片混乱,不知道如何妥善应对前所未有的生育率下降问题。通过将生育率下降仅仅定义为道德败坏和社会主义影响导致的一种社会疾病,德国社会失去了自我合理化的机会。鉴于作为主要行动者的女性无法参与关于这个问题的辩论,德国社会对抗这种疾病的症状而非根源也就不足为奇了。