Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda K J
Schnurmacher Institute for Vision Research, Department of Vision Sciences, State College of Optometry, State University of New York, New York.
Optom Vis Sci. 1990 Sep;67(9):667-9. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199009000-00001.
It has previously been suggested that the difference between tonic vergence (TV) and distance heterophoria may relate either to proximally induced vergence or accommodative divergence. To identify which of these components was responsible for this difference, the present study compared TV and distance heterophoria in a population of 20 subjects. However, distance heterophoria was now assessed with open-loop accommodation. No significant difference was observed between these two measures. This suggests that the previously observed variations between TV and distance heterophoria (with accommodation closed-loop) were produced by accommodative divergence. However, in a subgroup of 7 subjects, measurements of TV were more convergent (greater than 2 delta) than the distance heterophoria. In these subjects, proximally induced vergence may have accounted for the difference in response.