Suppr超能文献

最大吸气压力、气管气道阻断压及其比值在预测撤机结局中的比较:数字式吸引器和单向阀使用的影响。

Comparison of maximal inspiratory pressure, tracheal airway occlusion pressure, and its ratio in the prediction of weaning outcome: impact of the use of a digital vacuometer and the unidirectional valve.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hospital Universitário Antonio Pedro, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Niterói, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2012 Aug;57(8):1285-90. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01489. Epub 2012 Feb 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the predictive value of the maximal inspiratory pressure obtained by a digital vacuometer using a unidirectional valve (P(ImaxUV)) as to weaning outcome, and to compare its performance with the respiratory drive using airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 second (P(0.1)), and P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV).

METHODS

Patients on mechanical ventilation for > 24 hours who fulfilled the weaning criteria were prospectively enrolled. Measurements of P(ImaxUV) and P(0.1) were accomplished with a digital vacuometer with a unidirectional valve that allows only exhalation. Measured values were electronically recorded and stored on the digital vacuometer measurement device. Cutoff points for the used parameters were: absolute values of P(ImaxUV) > 30 cm H(2)O, P(0.1) < 2.3 cm H(2)O, and P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV) < 0.10. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the predictive values of the indexes.

RESULTS

One hundred three subjects completed the test. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.79 ± 0.04, 0.65 ± 0.05, and 0.74 ± 0.04 for P(ImaxUV), P(0.1), and P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for P(ImaxUV) was higher than for P(0.1) and P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV), but statistical significance was only found against P(0.1) (P = .007).

CONCLUSIONS

Every studied index had only a modest performance regarding prediction of weaning outcome. Of note, P(ImaxUV) values obtained by digital technology using a unidirectional valve performed better than historically reported using a conventional techniques, surpassing P(0.1) and P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV) in this regard.

摘要

目的

研究使用单向阀的数字式真空测压计测量的最大吸气压力(P(ImaxUV))对撤机结果的预测价值,并与 0.1 秒气道阻断压(P(0.1))和 P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV)的呼吸驱动能力进行比较。

方法

前瞻性纳入符合撤机标准并接受机械通气>24 小时的患者。使用带单向阀的数字式真空测压计测量 P(ImaxUV)和 P(0.1)。单向阀仅允许呼气。测量值通过电子方式记录并存储在数字式真空测压计测量设备上。所使用参数的截断值为:P(ImaxUV)绝对值>30cmH2O、P(0.1)<2.3cmH2O 和 P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV)<0.10。计算受试者工作特征曲线以比较各指标的预测价值。

结果

共有 103 例患者完成了该试验。P(ImaxUV)、P(0.1)和 P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为 0.79±0.04、0.65±0.05 和 0.74±0.04。P(ImaxUV)的受试者工作特征曲线下面积大于 P(0.1)和 P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV),但仅与 P(0.1)相比具有统计学意义(P=0.007)。

结论

所研究的每个指标对撤机结果的预测均仅有中等效能。值得注意的是,使用数字式单向阀技术获得的 P(ImaxUV)值的性能优于传统技术报告的值,在这方面优于 P(0.1)和 P(0.1)/P(ImaxUV)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验