Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Nangang, Taipei 115, Taiwan.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012 May;63(2):486-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.023. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
Weeds with broad distributions and large morphological variation are challenging for systematists and evolutionarily intriguing because their intensive dispersal would likely prevent local morphological differentiation. Study on weeds will help to understand divergence in plants unlikely to be affected by geographical and ecological barriers. We studied Youngia japonica based on nrDNA and cpDNA sequences. This is a widespread native in Asia and invasive worldwide; nevertheless, three subspecies (japonica, longiflora, and formosana) and an undescribed variant occur in Taiwan. Bayesian and the most parsimonious phylogenies revealed that subspecies longiflora is a different linage and independently arrived in Taiwan during the Pleistocene via land connection to the Asian Continent. Bayesian time estimation suggested that Youngia in Taiwan diverged in the lower Pleistocene or more recently. Extreme habitats that emerged in the Pleistocene, i.e., cold mountain ranges for subspecies formosana and xeric, raised coral reefs for the undescribed Youngia variant probably had triggered the divergence. Components of Youngia in Taiwan are not monophyletic; a coalescent-based test suggested incomplete lineage sorting. Nevertheless, the samples within each taxon share unique morphological features suggesting a common gene pool and each taxon has different dominant ITS and/or cpDNA types; these conditions suggest ongoing process toward monophyly via coalescent processes and support the delimitation of intraspecific taxa.
分布广泛且形态变异较大的杂草对系统发育学家来说是具有挑战性的,因为它们的密集传播可能会阻止局部形态分化。对杂草的研究将有助于了解不太可能受到地理和生态障碍影响的植物的分歧。我们基于 nrDNA 和 cpDNA 序列研究了日本瞿麦。这是一种在亚洲广泛分布的本地种,也是全球入侵种;然而,在台湾有三个亚种(日本瞿麦、长序瞿麦和台湾瞿麦)和一个未描述的变种。贝叶斯和最简约系统发育树揭示了长序瞿麦是一个不同的谱系,并且在更新世通过与亚洲大陆的陆地连接独立到达台湾。贝叶斯时间估计表明,台湾的日本瞿麦在更新世早期或更新世晚期分化而来。更新世出现的极端生境,即高海拔山脉为亚种台湾瞿麦,干旱珊瑚礁为未描述的日本瞿麦变种,可能引发了分化。台湾的日本瞿麦各组成部分不是单系的;基于合并的检验表明不完全谱系分选。然而,每个分类群内的样本都具有独特的形态特征,表明它们具有共同的基因库,并且每个分类群都有不同的主导 ITS 和/或 cpDNA 类型;这些情况表明,通过合并过程正在向单系性发展,并支持种内分类群的划定。