Grill F, Chochole M, Schultz A
Orthopädisches Spital Wien-Speising.
Orthopade. 1990 Sep;19(5):244-62.
Pelvic obliquity caused by leg length discrepancy is a problem facing patients with a wide variety of conditions. It is the degree of discrepancy and the growth pattern of the legs that usually govern treatment decisions, with the cause of the discrepancy having little influence. We analyzed the results recorded in 345 patients with pelvic obliquity caused by leg length inequality operated on between 1969 and 1989. In 146 patients a shortening procedure was done and in 199 patients a lengthening procedure. Biological bone growth stimulation did not prove to be predictable and effective in 65 cases. In 134 patients and 138 segments a distraction procedure was performed. In 26 segments the technique was according to Wagner; in 37 cases the Ilizarov fixator was used and in 75 the Orthofix device. Excellent results were obtained in 65% and good results in 23%; the condition became worse in 12%. Analysis of the results justifies the use of epiphysiodesis, shortening osteotomies and bone lengthening according to the biological principles investigated by Ilizarov in the presence of well-defined indications outlined in this report. Patients with a discrepancy of up to 2-3 cm are treated conservatively by shoe lift. For patients with a leg length inequality of 3-5 cm, epiphysiodesis or shortening osteotomy is still a good indication although lengthening procedures can also be performed. Discrepancies between 5 and 15 cm are treated mainly by lengthening operations. New lengthening techniques such as corticotomy and callus distraction, as well as new external fixation systems like Orthofix and Ilizarov, have made bone lengthening a less risky, easier, and more effective procedure. In a growing child, careful clinical and radiological assessment and repeated analysis of past growth in order to predict future growth can provide an exact plan for effective treatment, which often consists of bone lengthening, combined with shortening procedures on the contralateral side to establish leg length equality even in cases when there is 20 cm difference. Surgical treatment can be especially gratifying when anatomical, cosmetic and functional symmetry is restored and a lifetime of shoe lifts, braces or prostheses can be avoided.
腿长差异导致的骨盆倾斜是各类病症患者面临的一个问题。通常是腿长差异的程度和腿部的生长模式决定治疗方案,差异的原因影响较小。我们分析了1969年至1989年间接受手术治疗的345例因腿长不等导致骨盆倾斜患者的记录结果。146例患者进行了缩短手术,199例患者进行了延长手术。生物骨生长刺激在65例中未被证明具有可预测性和有效性。134例患者和138个节段进行了牵张手术。26个节段采用瓦格纳技术;37例使用了伊里扎洛夫固定器,75例使用了奥托菲克斯装置。65%的患者获得了优异结果,23%的患者结果良好;12%的患者病情恶化。结果分析表明,根据伊里扎洛夫研究的生物学原理,在本报告所述明确指征存在时,采用骨骺阻滞术、缩短截骨术和骨延长术是合理的。差异达2 - 3厘米的患者通过垫高鞋垫进行保守治疗。对于腿长不等3 - 5厘米的患者,骨骺阻滞术或缩短截骨术仍是较好的指征,尽管也可进行延长手术。5至15厘米的差异主要通过延长手术治疗。新的延长技术如皮质切开术和骨痂牵张术,以及新的外固定系统如奥托菲克斯和伊里扎洛夫固定器,使骨延长成为风险更低、更简便且更有效的手术。对于正在生长的儿童患者,仔细的临床和放射学评估以及对既往生长情况的反复分析以预测未来生长,可为有效治疗提供精确方案,有效治疗通常包括骨延长,同时在对侧进行缩短手术以实现腿长相等,即使差异达20厘米的情况也是如此。当恢复解剖学、美学和功能对称,避免终生使用鞋垫、支具或假肢时,手术治疗会特别令人满意。