• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异性恋和同性恋女性与男性中的内隐性取向关联。

Implicit sexual associations in heterosexual and homosexual women and men.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AT, UK.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Apr;42(3):475-85. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9920-z. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-012-9920-z
PMID:22350127
Abstract

Patterns of genital arousal to sexual stimuli are somewhat different between men and women. Heterosexual males and homosexual males show clear category specific arousal that is consistent with their self-reported sexual preference. However, heterosexual women do not show this category specificity. In the present study, we attempted to measure a person's automatic appraisals of stimuli with respect to the concept of sex via the use of implicit measures (the Implicit Association Test and the priming task). In three experiments, we showed that heterosexual females did not show a sex-related category specific response in favor of male versus female stimuli. However, this lack of specificity was not due to a lack of sex-related appraisals, but by equal appraisals of both male and female stimuli. On the other hand, heterosexual men, homosexual men, and homosexual women all showed automatic sex-related appraisals of stimuli that were category specific and in line with their self-reported sexual preference. The study shows difference in the pattern of sexual interest between genders at the earliest stages of the evaluation of a stimulus.

摘要

男性和女性的生殖器对性刺激的反应模式有些不同。异性恋男性和同性恋男性表现出明确的类别特异性反应,这与他们自我报告的性偏好一致。然而,异性恋女性并没有表现出这种类别特异性。在本研究中,我们试图通过使用内隐测量(内隐联想测验和启动任务)来衡量一个人对性概念的自动评价。在三个实验中,我们表明,异性恋女性对男性和女性刺激没有表现出与性相关的类别特异性反应。然而,这种缺乏特异性并不是因为缺乏与性相关的评价,而是因为对男性和女性刺激的评价相等。另一方面,异性恋男性、同性恋男性和同性恋女性对刺激的自动性评价都表现出与他们自我报告的性偏好相一致的类别特异性。这项研究表明,在对刺激进行评价的最早阶段,性别之间的性兴趣模式存在差异。

相似文献

1
Implicit sexual associations in heterosexual and homosexual women and men.异性恋和同性恋女性与男性中的内隐性取向关联。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Apr;42(3):475-85. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9920-z. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
2
Patterns of sexual arousal in homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual men.同性恋、双性恋和异性恋男性的性唤起模式。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Aug;40(4):687-97. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9746-0. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
3
A sex difference in the specificity of sexual arousal.性唤起特异性方面的性别差异。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Nov;15(11):736-44. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00750.x.
4
Neural correlates of sexual arousal in heterosexual and homosexual women and men.异性恋和同性恋男女的性唤起的神经相关性。
Horm Behav. 2013 Sep;64(4):673-84. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
5
Effects of gender and relationship context in audio narratives on genital and subjective sexual response in heterosexual women and men.音频叙事中性别和关系背景对异性恋女性和男性生殖器和主观性反应的影响。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Feb;41(1):185-97. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9937-3.
6
Neural correlates of sexual arousal in homosexual and heterosexual men.同性恋和异性恋男性性唤起的神经关联。
Behav Neurosci. 2007 Apr;121(2):237-48. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.237.
7
Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men.双性恋男性的性唤起模式。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):579-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01578.x.
8
Viewing time as a measure of bisexual sexual interest.将观看时间视为双性恋性兴趣的衡量标准。
Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Feb;41(1):161-72. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9923-9.
9
Implicit and explicit measurements of sexual preference in gay and heterosexual men: a comparison of priming techniques and the implicit association task.同性恋和异性恋男性性取向的内隐和外显测量:启动技术与内隐联想测验的比较
Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Aug;37(4):558-65. doi: 10.1007/s10508-006-9138-z.
10
Sex differences in patterns of genital sexual arousal: measurement artifacts or true phenomena?生殖器性唤起模式中的性别差异:测量假象还是真实现象?
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Aug;38(4):559-73. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9339-8. Epub 2008 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Lesbian and Heterosexual Women's Implicit Responses to Gender Figures.女同性恋和异性恋女性对性别人物的内隐反应。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Nov;53(10):3925-3943. doi: 10.1007/s10508-024-02972-9. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
2
Implicit Sexual Cognitions in Women with Ambiphilic Sexual Attractions: A Comparison to Androphilic and Gynephilic Women.具有两性吸引的女性的内隐性性认知:与男性恋和女性恋女性的比较。
Arch Sex Behav. 2024 Jan;53(1):141-152. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02727-y. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
3
Cognitive processing of sexual cues in asexual individuals and heterosexual women with desire/arousal difficulties.
无性个体和有欲望/唤起困难的异性恋女性对性线索的认知加工。
PLoS One. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0251074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251074. eCollection 2021.
4
Using Three Indirect Measures to Assess the Role of Sexuality-Related Associations and Interpretations for Women's Sexual Desire: An Internet-Based Experimental Study.采用三种间接测量方法评估与女性性欲相关的关联和解释的作用:一项基于互联网的实验研究。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Aug;50(6):2471-2484. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01897-3. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
Female Genital Arousal: A Focus on How Rather than Why.女性生殖器唤醒:关注方式而非原因。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):743-749. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01792-x. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Understanding heterosexual women's erotic flexibility: the role of attention in sexual evaluations and neural responses to sexual stimuli.理解异性恋女性的性灵活性:注意力在性评价和性刺激的神经反应中的作用。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 Jun 23;15(4):447-465. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa058.
7
The Empirical Status of the Preparation Hypothesis: Explicating Women's Genital Responses to Sexual Stimuli in the Laboratory.准备假说的实证状况:在实验室中阐述女性对性刺激的生殖器反应。
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Feb;51(2):709-728. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01599-5. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
8
Assessing Paraphilic Interests Among Women Who Sexually Offend.评估有性犯罪女性的恋物癖倾向。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Nov 18;21(12):121. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1112-2.
9
Sexual Attraction to Both Genders in Ambiphilic Men: Evidence from Implicit Cognitions.双性恋男性的两性吸引:内隐认知的证据。
Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):503-515. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01552-6. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
10
Latency-Based and Psychophysiological Measures of Sexual Interest Show Convergent and Concurrent Validity.基于潜伏期和心理生理的性兴趣测量具有趋同和同时效度。
Arch Sex Behav. 2018 Apr;47(3):637-649. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-1133-z. Epub 2017 Dec 20.