• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial.NCIC.CTG MA.5 随机试验中内在亚型对辅助蒽环类药物替代的反应性。
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15;18(8):2402-12. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2956. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
2
Topoisomerase II alpha protein and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF compared to CMF in the NCIC CTG randomized MA.5 adjuvant trial.拓扑异构酶 IIα 蛋白与乳腺癌对 CEF 辅助化疗的反应性,与 NCIC CTG 随机 MA.5 辅助试验中 CMF 的比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jul;128(2):401-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1511-5. Epub 2011 Apr 26.
3
TIMP-1 in combination with HER2 and TOP2A for prediction of benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in high-risk breast cancer patients.TIMP-1 联合 HER2 和 TOP2A 预测高危乳腺癌患者辅助蒽环类药物获益。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Feb;132(1):225-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1896-1. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
4
Chromosome 17 centromere (CEP17) duplication as a predictor of anthracycline response: evidence from the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) MA.5 Trial.17 号染色体着丝粒(CEP17)重复作为蒽环类药物反应的预测因子:来自 NCIC 临床试验组(NCIC CTG)MA.5 试验的证据。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Jan;131(2):541-51. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1840-4. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
5
Topoisomerase II alpha and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy.拓扑异构酶IIα与乳腺癌对辅助化疗的反应性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 6;101(9):644-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp067. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
6
Type 1 receptor tyrosine kinase profiles identify patients with enhanced benefit from anthracyclines in the BR9601 adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy trial.1型受体酪氨酸激酶谱可识别在BR9601辅助性乳腺癌化疗试验中从蒽环类药物治疗中获益更多的患者。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 1;26(31):5027-35. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6597. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
7
Differential response of immunohistochemically defined breast cancer subtypes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy with or without paclitaxel.免疫组化定义的乳腺癌亚型对含或不含紫杉醇的蒽环类辅助化疗的不同反应。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037946. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
8
HER2, TOP2A, and TIMP-1 and responsiveness to adjuvant anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients.人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)、拓扑异构酶 IIα(TOP2A)、基质金属蛋白酶组织抑制剂 1(TIMP-1)与高危乳腺癌患者对辅助含蒽环类化疗的反应性。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 20;28(6):984-90. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1166. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
9
Randomized trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer: update of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Trial MA5.比较环磷酰胺、表柔比星和氟尿嘧啶与环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶用于绝经前淋巴结阳性乳腺癌女性的随机试验:加拿大国家癌症研究所临床试验组MA5试验的更新
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5166-70. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.423.
10
HER2 and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy.人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)与乳腺癌对辅助化疗的反应性
N Engl J Med. 2006 May 18;354(20):2103-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054504.

引用本文的文献

1
Prosigna Risk of Recurrence score and intrinsic subtypes are associated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy benefit in high-risk breast cancer.Prosigna复发风险评分和内在亚型与高危乳腺癌辅助蒽环类化疗获益相关。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Mar 10;11(1):26. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00738-7.
2
From ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: the prognostic value of the extracellular microenvironment.从导管原位癌到浸润性乳腺癌:细胞外微环境的预后价值
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 23;43(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s13046-024-03236-z.
3
Clinical and molecular predictors of very late recurrence in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients.雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌患者极晚期复发的临床和分子预测因素。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jul;206(1):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07311-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
4
Genetic Testing Enhances the Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Cancer.基因检测增强乳腺癌精准诊断和治疗。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Nov 22;24(23):16607. doi: 10.3390/ijms242316607.
5
Less necessity of adjuvant S-1 treatment in non-monarchE-eligible patients.非 monarchE 适应证患者中辅助 S-1 治疗的必要性降低。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jun;12(12):13193-13203. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6006. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.激素受体阳性转移性乳腺癌中内在亚型的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
ESMO Open. 2023 Jun;8(3):101214. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101214. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
The Clinical Research and Latest Application of Genomic Assays in Early-Stage Breast Cancer.基因组分析在早期乳腺癌的临床研究与最新应用。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221117402. doi: 10.1177/15330338221117402.
8
Heterogeneity of triple negative breast cancer: Current advances in subtyping and treatment implications.三阴性乳腺癌的异质性:亚型分类的最新进展及对治疗的启示。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 1;41(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13046-022-02476-1.
9
A careful reassessment of anthracycline use in curable breast cancer.对蒽环类药物在可治愈性乳腺癌治疗中的应用进行仔细重新评估。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021 Oct 8;7(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00342-5.
10
Evaluation of tumor immune contexture among intrinsic molecular subtypes helps to predict outcome in early breast cancer.评估早期乳腺癌内在分子亚型中的肿瘤免疫微环境有助于预测预后。
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Jun;9(6). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002036.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer in Brazil: present status and future goals.巴西的乳腺癌现状和未来目标。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):e95-e102. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70323-0.
2
HER2 and TOP2A as predictive markers for anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.HER2 和 TOP2A 作为预测标志物用于含蒽环类药物的化疗方案作为乳腺癌辅助治疗:一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Nov;12(12):1134-42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70231-5. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
3
Alteration of topoisomerase II-alpha gene in human breast cancer: association with responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.拓扑异构酶 II-α 基因在人乳腺癌中的改变:与蒽环类药物化疗反应性的关联。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;29(7):859-67. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5644. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
4
A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.PAM50 内在亚型与激素受体阳性乳腺癌他莫昔芬治疗中免疫组化及临床预后因素的比较
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Nov 1;16(21):5222-32. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1282. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
5
CEF is superior to CMF for tumours with TOP2A aberrations: a Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis on Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study 89D.CEF 方案在 TOP2A 异常的肿瘤中优于 CMF 方案:丹麦乳腺癌合作组研究 89D 的亚组治疗效应模式图(STEPP)分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Aug;123(1):163-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0931-y. Epub 2010 May 13.
6
Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer.经典环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和氟尿嘧啶化疗在三阴性、淋巴结阴性乳腺癌中更有效:来自淋巴结阴性乳腺癌辅助化放疗的两项随机试验的结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jun 20;28(18):2966-73. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9549. Epub 2010 May 10.
7
Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse.乳腺癌亚型与局部和区域复发的风险。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1684-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9284. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
8
Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer.管腔B型乳腺癌患者的Ki67指数、HER2状态与预后
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 20;101(10):736-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp082. Epub 2009 May 12.
9
Topoisomerase II alpha and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy.拓扑异构酶IIα与乳腺癌对辅助化疗的反应性
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 May 6;101(9):644-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp067. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
10
Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes.基于内在亚型的乳腺癌监督风险预测器
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Mar 10;27(8):1160-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.1370. Epub 2009 Feb 9.

NCIC.CTG MA.5 随机试验中内在亚型对辅助蒽环类药物替代的反应性。

Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial.

机构信息

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Apr 15;18(8):2402-12. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2956. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2956
PMID:22351696
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3743660/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Recent studies suggest that intrinsic breast cancer subtypes may differ in their responsiveness to specific chemotherapy regimens. We examined this hypothesis on NCIC.CTG MA.5, a clinical trial randomizing premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil) versus CEF (cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil) chemotherapy.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Intrinsic subtype was determined for 476 tumors using the quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR PAM50 gene expression test. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and basal-like subtypes were correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing. Multivariable Cox regression analyses determined significance of interaction between treatment and intrinsic subtypes.

RESULTS

Intrinsic subtypes were associated with RFS (P = 0.0005) and OS (P < 0.0001) on the combined cohort. The HER2-E showed the greatest benefit from CEF versus CMF, with absolute 5-year RFS and OS differences exceeding 20%, whereas there was a less than 2% difference for non-HER2-E tumors (interaction test P = 0.03 for RFS and 0.03 for OS). Within clinically defined Her2(+) tumors, 79% (72 of 91) were classified as the HER2-E subtype by gene expression and this subset was strongly associated with better response to CEF versus CMF (62% vs. 22%, P = 0.0006). There was no significant difference in benefit between CEF and CMF in basal-like tumors [n = 94; HR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-2.1 for RFS and HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.5 for OS].

CONCLUSION

HER2-E strongly predicted anthracycline sensitivity. The chemotherapy-sensitive basal-like tumors showed no added benefit for CEF over CMF, suggesting that nonanthracycline regimens may be adequate in this subtype although further investigation is required.

摘要

目的

最近的研究表明,内在乳腺癌亚型在对特定化疗方案的反应上可能存在差异。我们在 NCIC.CTG MA.5 临床试验中检验了这一假说,该试验将淋巴结阳性乳腺癌的绝经前妇女随机分为辅助 CMF(环磷酰胺-甲氨蝶呤-氟尿嘧啶)与 CEF(环磷酰胺-表柔比星-氟尿嘧啶)化疗组。

实验设计

使用定量逆转录 PCR PAM50 基因表达测试对 476 例肿瘤进行内在亚型测定。采用 Kaplan-Meier 图和对数秩检验估计管腔 A、管腔 B、HER2 富集(HER2-E)和基底样亚型与无复发生存(RFS)和总生存(OS)的相关性。多变量 Cox 回归分析确定治疗与内在亚型之间交互作用的显著性。

结果

内在亚型与联合队列的 RFS(P = 0.0005)和 OS(P < 0.0001)相关。HER2-E 从 CEF 中获益最大,与 CMF 相比,绝对 5 年 RFS 和 OS 差异超过 20%,而非 HER2-E 肿瘤差异小于 2%(RFS 交互检验 P = 0.03,OS 交互检验 P = 0.03)。在临床定义的 Her2(+)肿瘤中,79%(91 例中的 72 例)通过基因表达被归类为 HER2-E 亚型,这一亚组与 CEF 对 CMF 的反应更好密切相关(62%对 22%,P = 0.0006)。CEF 和 CMF 在基底样肿瘤中获益无显著差异[n = 94;RFS 的 HR 为 1.1;95%置信区间(CI)为 0.6-2.1;OS 的 HR 为 1.3;95%CI 为 0.7-2.5]。

结论

HER2-E 强烈预测蒽环类药物敏感性。化疗敏感的基底样肿瘤中,CEF 相对于 CMF 没有额外获益,这表明非蒽环类药物方案可能在该亚型中足够,但需要进一步研究。