Murayama Hiroshi, Shibui Yu, Kawashima Takako, Kano Noriko, Toratani Akiko, Tachibana Reiko, Shibuta Keiko, Fukuda Yoshiharu, Murashima Sachiyo
Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011 Oct;58(10):851-66.
To examine the relationship between homebound status and physical, mental, social and life space factors among community-dwelling elderly in an urban area.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a mail-in self-administered questionnaire between July and September 2009. The target population comprised 149,991 community residents, aged 65 years and over, living in Setagaya Ward, Tokyo, as of April 2009. "Homebound" was defined as going out (leaving the home) only once a week or less. The respondents were further identified as "type 1" or "type 2" homebound; type 1 included those with a low frequency of outings and low mobility level, and type 2 included those with a low frequency of outings despite having a high mobility level. Questionnaire items encompassed frequency of outings and demographic data, as well as physical, mental, social and life space factors.
A total of 103,684 questionnaires were included in the analysis (valid response rate: 69.1%). Among the participants, 3.7% were found to be type 1 homebound and 4.5% were type 2. The older the age group, the higher was the proportion of both types of homebound. Physical and social factors were associated with type 1 homebound, and physical, mental and social factors with type 2. Moreover, regarding the life space factor, poor physical accessibility of the home was associated with type 2 homebound, and less space utilization in daily life was associated with both types.
It is important for homebound reduction among the elderly to address the physical, mental and social factors that affect homebound status. In addition, assessing the current home environment and expanding the daily living space could also be strategies to reduce homebound prevalence among the elderly. Collaboration with the housing and public transportation sectors is needed to plan a comprehensive homebound reduction strategy.
探讨城市社区居家老年人的居家状态与身体、心理、社会及生活空间因素之间的关系。
于2009年7月至9月采用邮寄自填式问卷进行横断面调查。目标人群为截至2009年4月居住在东京世田谷区的149,991名65岁及以上的社区居民。“居家”定义为每周外出(离开家)一次或更少。受访者进一步分为“1型”或“2型”居家;1型包括外出频率低且行动能力水平低的人,2型包括尽管行动能力水平高但外出频率低的人。问卷项目包括外出频率、人口统计学数据以及身体、心理、社会和生活空间因素。
共有103,684份问卷纳入分析(有效回复率:69.1%)。在参与者中,发现3.7%为1型居家,4.5%为2型。年龄组越大,两种类型居家的比例越高。身体和社会因素与1型居家相关,身体、心理和社会因素与2型居家相关。此外,关于生活空间因素,家庭的身体可达性差与2型居家相关,日常生活中空间利用较少与两种类型均相关。
解决影响居家状态的身体、心理和社会因素对于减少老年人居家情况很重要。此外,评估当前家庭环境并扩大日常生活空间也可能是降低老年人居家患病率的策略。需要与住房和公共交通部门合作制定全面的减少居家策略。